Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr;15(3):101734.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101734. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Nina Rosa Neuendorff et al. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; Autologous stem-cell transplantation; CAR-T; Cellular therapies; Geriatric assessment; Multiple myeloma; Older adults; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest SY, MA, AR, AK, and SD declared no conflicts of interest. NRN has received honoraria and travel support by Janssen-Cilag, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Abbvie, Hexal, and Jazz Pharmaceutical. BvT is an advisor or consultant for Allogene, BMS/Celgene, Cerus, Incyte, IQVIA, Gilead Kite, Miltenyi, Novartis, Noscendo, Pentixapharm, Roche, Amgen, Pfizer, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Gilead Kite; has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, Takeda, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; reports research funding from Novartis (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), and Takeda (Inst); and reports travel support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead Kite, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Takeda, and Novartis. FU reports honoraria and travel support from Roche, AbbVie, InCyte, and Kite Gilead. RJL reports consulting fees from KITE, a Gilead Company, and IAC Member – Prothera. RC has received honoraria and travel support by Janssen, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Lilly, Beigene, Kite, BMS, Incyte; and reports research grant from Pfizer. AA reports honoraria from Abbvie and Magenta therapeutics.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances