Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):270.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10742-5.

Assessment of the feasibility of a community-based mental health training programme for persons with disabilities by non-specialists from different stakeholders' perspectives in Bangladesh

Affiliations

Assessment of the feasibility of a community-based mental health training programme for persons with disabilities by non-specialists from different stakeholders' perspectives in Bangladesh

Kamrun Nahar Koly et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Bangladesh is a developing country where 11% of the population has at least one disability, but no community-level mental health service is available. There is limited evidence of the burden of mental health issues and health-seeking behaviour among this population. This study assessed the feasibility of a training intervention for persons with disabilities, where peer support providers provided community-based disability-inclusive mental health services.

Methods: Four stakeholder groups participated in this qualitative study: peer responders (trained persons with disabilities), trainers, representatives of organisations of persons with disabilities and disability-specific organisations, and officials of international and national non-governmental organisations. Two types of qualitative interviews were used to collect data, and thematic analysis techniques were utilised.

Result: Stakeholders perceived the peer responder training programme as acceptable for persons with disabilities to develop themselves as peer support providers, with potential benefits including increased mental health literacy, ensuring accessible mental health services, and improving the well-being of persons with disabilities. Potential challenges included receiving training and delivering services. Increased training duration, more fieldwork, supervision opportunities, and refresher training were recommended to mitigate training challenges. Financial support and formal community recognition were deemed necessary for training delivery.

Conclusion: The peer responder training programme was feasible to ensure accessible mental health services for persons with disabilities, build a workforce to screen for mental health conditions, and provide appropriate referrals. A multi-sectoral collaboration of government and non-governmental institutions is recommended to policy advocates to expand the peer responder training programme in the mainstream mental healthcare system.

Keywords: Bangladesh; Mental health; Peer support; Person with disabilities; Training programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hossain MD, et al. Mental disorders in Bangladesh: a systematic review. BMC Psych. 2014;14(1):1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuri NN, et al. Pathways to care of patients with mental health problems in Bangladesh. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2018;12(1):1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasan MT, et al. The current state of mental healthcare in Bangladesh: part 1–an updated country profile. BJPsych Int. 2021;18:78–82. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.41. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honey A, Emerson E, Llewellyn G. The mental health of young people with disabilities: impact of social conditions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011;46(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0161-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milner A, et al. Employment status and mental health among persons with and without a disability: evidence from an Australian cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(11):1064–1071. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204147. - DOI - PubMed