Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;44(4):686-692.
doi: 10.1111/opo.13299. Epub 2024 Mar 3.

Refitting contact lens dropouts into a modern daily disposable contact lens

Affiliations

Refitting contact lens dropouts into a modern daily disposable contact lens

Chris Lievens et al. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the number of previous contact lens (CL) wearers who could be comfortably refitted into delefilcon A (DAILIES TOTAL1®) CLs.

Methods: This was a 6-month, three-visit study that recruited subjects who discontinued CLs within the past 2 years because of discomfort or dryness symptoms. Subjects were required to have Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire scores ≤3 and to be able to wear spherical study CLs. Subjects were asked to complete a ±50 comfort visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1 month and a Likert questionnaire after 1 and 6 months of CL wear to understand the subjects' CL experience.

Results: All 60 subjects who were fitted with the study CLs were still wearing them after 1 month, while one subject had dropped out by 6 months. Subjects had a median (interquartile range) age of 24.0 (7.0) years (71.7% female). They reported a median VAS score of 44.0 (8.0) units at the 1-month visit, with all reporting a comfortable score. At the 1-month/6-month visits, 98.3%/93.2%, 86.5%/78.0% and 93.2%/91.5% of subjects responded that they were very satisfied or satisfied with their vision, their end-of-day CL comfort and overall CL comfort, respectively. The same subjects responded that they were very likely or likely to continue to wear the study CLs at 1 (89.6%) and 6 months (80.7%) and to recommend the study CLs to a friend at 1 (98.3%) and 6 months (93.2%).

Conclusions: The results suggest that when encountering a CL dropout, a practitioner could educate a patient about trying an alternative CL and consider delefilcon A lenses as an option.

Keywords: DAILIES TOTAL1®; comfort; contact lens dropout; daily disposable; questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Pucker AD, Tichenor AA. A review of contact lens dropout. Clin Optom. 2020;12:85–94.
    1. Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39:93–99.
    1. Siddireddy JS, Tan J, Vijay AK, Willcox M. Predictive potential of eyelids and tear film in determining symptoms in contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95:1035–1045.
    1. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:234–243.
    1. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi‐centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:516–527.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources