Applications of motivational interviewing in adolescent solid organ transplant
- PMID: 38433587
- DOI: 10.1111/petr.14721
Applications of motivational interviewing in adolescent solid organ transplant
Abstract
Background: Adolescence is a developmental period that is known for the highest risk of difficulties with adoption and maintenance of health behaviors for successful transplant. Motivational interviewing (MI) has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy in the management of modifiable factors impacting adherence in both adult transplant and analogous pediatric chronic illness populations.
Aims: This paper describes MI and its applicability to adolescent transplant, providing examples of its potential use at each stage of the transplant journey.
Materials and methods: Literature on the principles and utilization of MI are reviewed, as well as the use of MI in adult transplant and similar pediatric populations.
Results: Evidence suggests high applicability of concepts of MI to pediatric transplant.
Discussion: Systems-level factors influencing health behavior change are discussed, along with the importance of recognizing and managing provider bias in MI-based interactions. MI does not require a licensed behavioral health provider to use it effectively; rather, it can be used by various multidisciplinary team members throughout the course of clinical care.
Conclusion: MI shows great promise as a useful intervention through all stages in the transplant journey. Though particularly well-suited to adolescents, its principles are effective across the lifespan, including with caregivers. It represents an interactional style for use by multidisciplinary team members in many patient-and caregiver-facing scenarios. As the goal is to support the patient's autonomy in decision-making, it is important for providers to recognize their own biases. Further resources for training are provided.
Keywords: adolescents; motivational interviewing; pediatrics; transplant.
© 2024 The Authors. Pediatric Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- LaRosa C, Jorge Baluarte H, Meyers KEC. Outcomes in pediatric solid-organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2011;15(2):128-141. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01434.x
-
- Oliva M, Singh TP, Gauvreau K, Vanderpluym CJ, Bastardi HJ, Almond CS. Impact of medication non-adherence on survival after pediatric heart transplantation in the USA. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(9):881-888. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.03.008
-
- Steinberg L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008;28(1):78-106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
-
- Bitsko RH. Mental health surveillance among children-United States, 2013-2019. MMWR Suppl. 2022;71:1. doi:10.15585/mmwr.su7102a1
-
- Gutiérrez-Colina AM, Eaton CK, Lee JL, et al. Executive functioning, barriers to adherence, and nonadherence in adolescent and young adult transplant recipients. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016;41(7):759-767. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsv107
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
