Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the perception of conscience questionnaire in Iranian nurses
- PMID: 38433814
- PMCID: PMC10909336
- DOI: 10.18502/jmehm.v16i16.14615
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the perception of conscience questionnaire in Iranian nurses
Abstract
Conscience is defined as the cornerstone of ethics and is considered a valuable asset. There is, however, little evidence about how Iranian nurses perceive conscience. The purpose of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the Perception of Conscience Questionnaire (PCQ) in Iranian nurses. In this cross-sectional and descriptive study, a psychometric evaluation of the PCQ was conducted on Iranian nurses in 2022. A total of 300 nurses participated in this study to validate the PCQ. At first, the initial translation and determination of face validity was done, and content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index and Content Validity Ratio. Reliability was determined by intra-class correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The construct validity of the PCQ was determined by exploratory factor analysis, which led to the extraction of five factors of warning signal, valuable asset, spiritual power, burden and conscience outcomes from the initial 14 factors of the questionnaire. Reliability of the whole questionnaire was calculated to be 0.80 using Cronbach's alpha. While an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.58 indicated average stability, the five-factor construct of the PCQ showed good validity and reliability. Therefore, our findings proved that this tool is suitable for assessing Iranian nurses' perception of conscience.
Keywords: Conscience; Ethics; Nurse; Psychometrics..
Copyright © 2023 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this research project and paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the nurse spiritual care therapeutics scale (NSCTS).BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 12;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00750-1. BMC Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 33845815 Free PMC article.
-
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the "Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale".BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01182-3. BMC Nurs. 2023. PMID: 36698171 Free PMC article.
-
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the nurses' quality of life scale: a validation study in Iran.BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 18;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01839-7. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38494485 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the SpREUK-P Questionnaire: An Instrument for Measuring the Importance and Frequency of Spiritual/Religious Practices in Iranian Patients with Chronic Gastrointestinal Diseases.J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3458-3469. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01427-y. Epub 2021 Sep 21. J Relig Health. 2022. PMID: 34546518
-
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28851797 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Nurses' perception of troubled conscience in intensive care units: a qualitative study.BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02230-2. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39169361 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Glasberg A-L, Lindahl E, Lü tzén K, Strandberg G, et al. Development of the perceptions of conscience questionnaire. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14(2):181–93. - PubMed
-
- Abdulwaly UC. [Pedoman Murajaah Al-Qur’an] Farha Pustaka; 2020.
-
- Lamb C, Evans M, Babenko-Mould Y, Wong CA, Kirkwood KW. Conscience, conscientious objection, and nursing: a concept analysis. Nursing Ethics. 2019;26(1):37–49. - PubMed
-
- Rhodes R. Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2019;40:487–506. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources