Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 10;27(3):109201.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109201. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

Interactions between electromagnetic radiation and biological systems

Affiliations
Review

Interactions between electromagnetic radiation and biological systems

Lingyu Liu et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Even though the bioeffects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) have been extensively investigated during the past several decades, our understandings of the bioeffects of EMR and the mechanisms of the interactions between the biological systems and the EMRs are still far from satisfactory. In this article, we introduce and summarize the consensus, controversy, limitations, and unsolved issues. The published works have investigated the EMR effects on different biological systems including humans, animals, cells, and biochemical reactions. Alternative methodologies also include dielectric spectroscopy, detection of bioelectromagnetic emissions, and theoretical predictions. In many studies, the thermal effects of the EMR are not properly controlled or considered. The frequency of the EMR investigated is limited to the commonly used bands, particularly the frequencies of the power line and the wireless communications; far fewer studies were performed for other EMR frequencies. In addition, the bioeffects of the complex EM environment were rarely discussed. In summary, our understanding of the bioeffects of the EMR is quite restrictive and further investigations are needed to answer the unsolved questions.

Keywords: Biological sciences; Electromagnetics; Physics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Investigations of the bioeffects of the EMR
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Current theories for explaining the bioeffects of EMR (A) Ion cyclotron resonance model applied to EMR effects on calcium influx and downstream signaling pathways (adapted from204,236); (B and C) Radical pair theory. (B) Energy diagram of electronic spin states (S, T0, T+, and T) of a radical pair in a magnetic field B. The vector representation corresponding to each spin state were shown by the cartoon next to the curve. The triplet spin states (T0, T+, and T) are energy degenerate at B = 0, but T+ and T are split to higher and lower energy from T0 at B > 0. Meanwhile, the energy level of the spin states S and T0 are unaffected by the magnetic field B (adapted from211). (C) Reaction scheme for a radical pair reaction with magnetic field-dependent reaction products. The radical pair is generated by an electron transfer from a donor molecule D, which is excited by light, to an acceptor molecule A. The external magnetic field affects the interconversion between the singlet and triplet states of the radical pair (adapted from207,208). (D) Radical pair reaction of Cry. A flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) bounded with cryptochrome (Cry) is excited by a photon (FAD→FAD∗) and then protonated (FAD∗→(FADH+)∗). Three electron transfers occur sequentially: the first one is from the tryptophan residue (WA) of the Cry to (FADH+)∗, the second from tryptophan residue WB to WA, and the third from tryptophan residue WC to WB, generating magnetosensitive singlet and triplet radical pairs (S[FADH⋅ WA/B/C+] and T[FADH⋅ WA/B/C+]). The different spin states of the radical pairs act differently in the reaction cascade (adapted from212,220,237). (E) Magnetosensitive radical pair reactions involving radical pairs of enzyme-bound neutral flavin FADH and superoxide (singlet state S[FADH⋅ O2] and triplet state T[FADH⋅ O2]) (adapted from144).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bianchi C., Meloni A. Natural and man-made terrestrial electromagnetic noise An outlook. Ann. Geophys. 2007;50:435–445.
    1. Constable C. Earth’s electromagnetic environment. Surv. Geophys. 2015;37:27–45. doi: 10.1007/s10712-015-9351-1. - DOI
    1. Bandara P., Carpenter D.O. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. Lancet Planet. Health. 2018;2:e512–e514. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belyaev I., Dean A., Eger H., Hubmann G., Jandrisovits R., Kern M., Kundi M., Moshammer H., Lercher P., Müller K., et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev. Environ. Health. 2016;31:363–397. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Redmayne M. International policy and advisory response regarding children's exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2016;35:176–185. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1038832. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources