Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 1;14(11):7359-7370.
doi: 10.1039/d3ra06354b. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

Bi-doped BaBiO3 (x = 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) perovskite oxides by a sol-gel method: comprehensive biological assessment and RhB photodegradation

Affiliations

Bi-doped BaBiO3 (x = 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) perovskite oxides by a sol-gel method: comprehensive biological assessment and RhB photodegradation

Wissam Bouchal et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

The BaBiO3 (BBO) perovskite oxide was prepared via a sol-gel method with different concentrations of Bi nitrate and examined as a photocatalyst for RhB degradation under sunlight, and its antioxidant and antibacterial activities were examined. X-ray diffraction (XRD) indicated the formation of a BaBiO3-BaCO3 (BBO-BCO) binary composite. For the degradation of RhB under solar radiation, high photocatalytic activity (73%) was observed. According to the antibacterial activity study, the addition of Bi enhanced the antibacterial activity of the resulting material against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. The Bi%-BBO (Bi 20%) inhibited 96.23% S. aureus. 10% Bi-BBO as an antioxidant agent had the most efficacious IC50 value of 2.50 mg mL-1. These results seem to suggest that BBO-BCO is a promising catalytic material with potential application in the fields of catalysis and medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. TG curves of BaBiO3–BaCO3 (pure – 20% Bi) precursors heated in air at 5° min−1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. XRD patterns of the BBO–BCO powders with different excess of Bi.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (a) Evaluation of the highest X-ray diffraction peak positions for BBO and BCO, (b) BCO and BBO composition as a function of Bi content (%), (c) dependence of lattice volume on bismuth content for BBO and BCO and (d) plot showing the evaluation of average crystallite size of Bi%–BBO with Bi wt. (%).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of % Bi–BBO powder samples calcined at 900 °C.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) UV-Visible reflectance spectra and (b) graph used for band gap estimation of Bi%–BBO.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Micrographs and particle size histograms for BaBiO3–BaCO3: (a) pure BBO, (b) 5% excess Bi, (c) 10% excess Bi, (d) 15% excess Bi, and (e) 20% excess Bi particles.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) EDS spectrum of the as-prepared sample (20% excess Bi) and (b) variation in Bi wt% as a function of Bi content.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Absorption spectra of RhB by BBO–BCO NPs under solar energy for different durations: (a) 0% Bi–BBO, (b) 5% Bi–BBO, (c) 10% Bi–BBO, (d) 15% Bi–BBO, and (e) 20% Bi–BBO.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. (a) Relationship between degradation efficiency and crystallite size and (b) recycling of Bi%–BBO for the photodegradation of RhB.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Nonlinear fitting of (a) PFO and (b) PSO models for RhB degradation.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. Schematic illustration of basic mechanism.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. (a) DPPH radical scavenging activity of % Bi–BBO and ascorbic acid. (b) Relationship between IC50 DPPH and crystallite size.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13. Bacterial inhibition (%) of pure BBO and BBO with different excess Bi (%) against E. coli and S. aureus.

Similar articles

References

    1. Larsson S. Jansson M. Boholm Å. J. Nanopart. Res. 2019;21:1–17. - PubMed
    1. Nasrollahzadeh M. Atarod M. Sajjadi M. Sajadi S. M. Issaabadi Z. Interface Sci. Technol. 2019;28:199–322.
    1. Knell M., Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development, 2010, pp. 127–143
    1. Linic S. Aslam U. Boerigter C. Morabito M. Nat. Mater. 2015;146:567–576. - PubMed
    1. Darabi R. Alown F. E. D. Aygun A. Gu Q. Gulbagca F. Altuner E. E. Seckin H. Meydan I. Kaymak G. Sen F. Karimi-Maleh H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48:21270–21284.