How do medical professionals make sense (or not) of AI? A social-media-based computational grounded theory study and an online survey
- PMID: 38434249
- PMCID: PMC10904922
- DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.009
How do medical professionals make sense (or not) of AI? A social-media-based computational grounded theory study and an online survey
Abstract
To investigate opinions and attitudes of medical professionals towards adopting AI-enabled healthcare technologies in their daily business, we used a mixed-methods approach. Study 1 employed a qualitative computational grounded theory approach analyzing 181 Reddit threads in the several subreddits of r/medicine. By utilizing an unsupervised machine learning clustering method, we identified three key themes: (1) consequences of AI, (2) physician-AI relationship, and (3) a proposed way forward. In particular Reddit posts related to the first two themes indicated that the medical professionals' fear of being replaced by AI and skepticism toward AI played a major role in the argumentations. Moreover, the results suggest that this fear is driven by little or moderate knowledge about AI. Posts related to the third theme focused on factual discussions about how AI and medicine have to be designed to become broadly adopted in health care. Study 2 quantitatively examined the relationship between the fear of AI, knowledge about AI, and medical professionals' intention to use AI-enabled technologies in more detail. Results based on a sample of 223 medical professionals who participated in the online survey revealed that the intention to use AI technologies increases with increasing knowledge about AI and that this effect is moderated by the fear of being replaced by AI.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI); Job-replacement anxiety; Medical AI; Medical professionals; Social media analysis; Technology acceptance.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The Drivers of Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Care Pathways Among Medical Professionals: Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e33368. doi: 10.2196/33368. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35727614 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer care at the time of the fourth industrial revolution: an insight to healthcare professionals' perspectives on cancer care and artificial intelligence.Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02351-z. Radiat Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37814325 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Social Media Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70008. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39445247 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring healthcare professionals' understanding and experiences of artificial intelligence technology use in the delivery of healthcare: An integrative review.Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):1225-1236. doi: 10.1177/1460458219874641. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Health Informatics J. 2020. PMID: 31566454 Review.
-
Western Australian medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence in healthcare.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 31;18(8):e0290642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290642. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37651380 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimization of diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases via artificial intelligence.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 7;11:1487234. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1487234. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39574909 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Study of Physician Attitudes and Perceptions in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57256. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57256. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38686273 Free PMC article.
-
Development of oculomics artificial intelligence for cardiovascular risk factors: A case study in fundus oculomics for HbA1c assessment and clinically relevant considerations for clinicians.Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024 Jul-Aug;13(4):100095. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100095. Epub 2024 Aug 28. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024. PMID: 39209216 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decis Sci. 1999;30(2):361–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x. - DOI
-
- Aguinis H., Villamor I., Ramani R.S. MTurk research: review and recommendations. J Manag. 2021;47(4):823–837. doi: 10.1177/0149206320969787. - DOI
-
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources