Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 15;14(1):59-71.
doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-305. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

Doppler echocardiography for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a 28-year single-center experience

Affiliations

Doppler echocardiography for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a 28-year single-center experience

Aurélien Vallée et al. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are recommended for the detection of acute cardiac rejection (ACR) despite limited sensitivity. We report the long-term post-transplant results of Doppler echocardiography as a noninvasive alternative of routine EMB.

Methods: Two cohorts of heart transplantation (HT) recipients were chronologically defined as follows: the Dual Monitoring Cohort (DMC) from January 1990 to December 1997 included patients who underwent routine EMB and Doppler echocardiography within 24 hours for ACR surveillance; and the "Echo-First Cohort" (EFC), including patients transplanted from January 1998 to December 2018 with Doppler echocardiography as first-line approach for ACR surveillance. Echocardiographic measurements of interest were collected: early diastolic (E) wave peak velocity; pressure half time (PHT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). Post-transplant outcomes were reviewed and the Kaplan-Meier approach was used for survival estimates. Inter-operator variability for ultrasound measurements was investigated. Data were collected from medical records from January 2019 to December 2020.

Results: A total of 228 patients were included, 99 patients in the DMC and 129 in the EFC. Overall, 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 65.4%, 55.5% and 44.1% respectively, without any significant difference between the two cohorts (log rank test, P=0.71). Echocardiography variables and EMB findings were associated with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.91], 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.94) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94) respectively for E wave, PHT and IVRT. IVRT and PHT were significantly decreased, and E wave significantly increased, in case of histologically proven ACR. Inter-operator variability was not significant for E wave and IVRT measurements (P=0.13 and 0.30 respectively).

Conclusions: Doppler echocardiography as a first-line method for surveillance of ACR did not impair long-term results after HT. These findings suggest that this non-invasive approach might be a reasonable alternative to systematic EMB, limiting risk and improving the quality of life.

Keywords: Heart transplantation (HT); acute rejection; echocardiography; endomyocardial biopsy (EMB); long-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (Available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-23-305/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart illustrating the study design. The Dual Monitoring Cohort included patients transplanted from January 1990 to December 1997 with conventional endomyocardial biopsies screening. The Echo-First Cohort included patients transplanted from January 1998 to December 2018 who undergo Doppler echocardiography as first-line approach for surveillance of acute allograft rejection. yo, years old.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier approach (95% confidence interval) for the study population (A) and comparison of survival curves between the Dual Monitoring Cohort and the Echo-First Cohort (B). Censoring is indicated by a vertical mark.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temporal diagram of repeated ultrasound measurements in case of negative biopsy (Biop0) or positive biopsy (Biop1), for the 10 first samples (mean value and 95% confidence interval). IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; PHT, pressure half time.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operative characteristics curves for ultrasound measurements considering the first event (A), the second event (B) and the third event (C). These figures show a clinically relevant relationship between ultrasound parameters and histologically-proven acute allograft rejection at the second and third events after transplant with areas under the curve ≥0.65 for all parameters. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; PHT, pressure half time.

References

    1. Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC, et al. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fifth Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2018; Focus Theme: Multiorgan Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018;37:1155-68. 10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamour IM, Burke MM, Bell AD, et al. Limited utility of endomyocardial biopsy in the first year after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2008;85:969-74. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318168d571 - DOI - PubMed
    1. From AM, Maleszewski JJ, Rihal CS. Current status of endomyocardial biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:1095-102. 10.4065/mcp.2011.0296 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godown J, McKane M, Mettler BA, et al. Increased Frequency of Surveillance Biopsy Does Not Improve Pediatric Heart Transplant Outcomes: Time for a Change in Practice? J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35:S73. 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.199 - DOI
    1. Taylor AJ, Vaddadi G, Pfluger H, et al. Diagnostic performance of multisequential cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute cardiac allograft rejection. Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12:45-51. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp174 - DOI - PMC - PubMed