Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53363.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.53363. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

Affiliations

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

Eiji Tanaka et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the correlation of craniofacial morphology with maxillary sinus morphology and to evaluate whether orthodontic treatment facilitates maxillary sinus enlargement in adults. Materials and methods A total of 45 adult women underwent cephalography and computed tomography before and after orthodontic treatment. All participants were classified into three groups: skeletal class I, II, and III. The average dimensions and volume of the maxillary sinus were calculated in each subgroup. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the correlations of maxillary sinus dimensions with 20 cephalometric variables. Results Before treatment, the maxillary sinus width, height, depth, and volume were 32.2 ± 3.9 mm, 39.5 ± 3.8 mm, 38.6 ± 1.8 mm, and 36,179.3 ± 5,454.0 mm3 in skeletal class I, 33.9 ± 6.2 mm, 37.3 ± 3.5 mm, 38.6 ± 2.4 mm, and 34,729.8 ± 6,686.6 mm3 in skeletal class II, and 32.0 ± 4.3 mm, 41.8 ± 5.0 mm, 38.0 ± 2.8 mm, and 35,592.3 ± 10,334.3 mm3 in skeletal class III, respectively. Despite no significant differences in maxillary sinus width, depth, or volume, the height was significantly lower in the skeletal class II than in the other two. Regardless of the skeletal pattern, maxillary sinus height and volume increased considerably after treatment. Moreover, the maxillary sinus width was substantially involved in pretreatment U1 to SN and overbite and posttreatment U1 to NA and overjet. Conclusion Except for the height, the maxillary sinus dimensions were almost similar, irrespective of the skeletal classification. The posttreatment sinus height and volume were significantly greater than the pretreatment values, although the sinus width and length showed no significant changes during orthodontic treatment. This implies that orthodontic treatment may facilitate the enlargement of the maxillary sinus even after physical growth.

Keywords: computed tomography; craniofacial morphology; maxillary sinus; orthodontic treatment; volumetric change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative images of the maxillary sinuses.

References

    1. Prenatal development of the maxillary sinus: a perspective for paranasal sinus surgery. Nuñez-Castruita A, López-Serna N, Guzmán-López S. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146:997–1003. - PubMed
    1. Normal anatomy and anatomic variants of the paranasal sinuses on computed tomography. Vaid S, Vaid N. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2015;25:527–548. - PubMed
    1. Assessment of International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification among senior residents through inter- and intra-rater reliability. Assiri K, Alroqi A, Aldrees T, Almatrafi S. Saudi Med J. 2020;41:466–472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The frontal sinus and frontal recess: anatomical, radiological and surgical concepts. Dassi CS, Demarco FR, Mangussi-Gomes J, Weber R, Balsalobre L, Stamm AC. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24:0–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pneumatized spaces, sinuses and spongy bones in the skulls of primates. Preuschoft H, Witte H, Witzel U. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29542345. Anthropol Anz. 2002;60:67–79. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources