Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53433.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.53433. eCollection 2024 Feb.

A Comprehensive Review of Evaluating Donor Site Morbidity and Scar Outcomes in Skin Transfer Techniques

Affiliations
Review

A Comprehensive Review of Evaluating Donor Site Morbidity and Scar Outcomes in Skin Transfer Techniques

Yogesh B Manek et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

This comprehensive review delves into the intricacies of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes in skin transfer techniques central to the field of reconstructive surgery. The review synthesizes existing literature to illuminate the multifaceted factors influencing outcomes by surveying a broad spectrum of grafting methods, from traditional autografts to cutting-edge tissue engineering approaches. Key findings underscore the complex interplay of graft characteristics, surgical techniques, and patient-specific variables. The implications for clinical practice advocate for a nuanced, patient-centered approach, incorporating emerging minimally invasive procedures and adjuvant therapies. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, emphasizing the importance of longitudinal studies, comparative analyses, patient-reported outcomes, advanced imaging techniques, and exploration of tissue engineering innovations. This synthesis advances our understanding of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes. It provides a roadmap for refining clinical protocols, ultimately enhancing the delicate balance between therapeutic efficacy and patient well-being in reconstructive surgery.

Keywords: donor site morbidity; graft characteristics; reconstructive surgery; scar outcomes; skin transfer techniques; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Applied bioengineering in tissue reconstruction, replacement, and regeneration . Colazo JM, Evans BC, Farinas AF, Al-Kassis S, Duvall CL, Thayer WP. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25:259–290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. An algorithmic approach to reconstructive surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration. Hanasono MM, Lee JC, Yang JS, Skoracki RJ, Reece GP, Esmaeli B. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98–105. - PubMed
    1. Donor site morbidity following harvest of split-thickness skin grafts in south eastern Nigeria. Otene CI, Olaitan PB, Ogbonnaya IS, Nnabuko RE. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27182501/ J West Afr Coll Surg. 2011;1:86–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braza ME, Fahrenkopf MP. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Split-thickness skin grafts. - PubMed
    1. Split Thickness Skin Graft | Iowa Head and Neck Protocols. [ Dec; 2023 ]. 2023. https://medicine.uiowa.edu/iowaprotocols/split-thickness-skin-graft https://medicine.uiowa.edu/iowaprotocols/split-thickness-skin-graft

LinkOut - more resources