Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Feb 16:12:1335072.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335072. eCollection 2024.

Assessing the clinical benefit, safety, and patient-reported outcomes with the use of the PAHcare™ digital platform in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pilot study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Assessing the clinical benefit, safety, and patient-reported outcomes with the use of the PAHcare™ digital platform in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pilot study

Gregorio Pérez Peñate et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Digital health interventions, particularly mobile health platforms, have shown promise in supporting patients with respiratory conditions, but their application in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains limited. We aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical benefit of the novel PAHcare™ digital platform as a patient-centred intervention for PAH management through a prospective, single-arm, multicenter pilot study conducted on 53 patients diagnosed with PAH who used the platform for 6 months.

Methods: The primary objective was to assess the impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) through questionnaires. Secondary objectives included evaluating clinical outcomes, including disease progression, PAH signs and symptoms, the 6-min walking test, and the patient's symptom perception. Additionally, we assessed patient satisfaction and engagement with the PAHcare™ platform, interaction with health coaches, retention, costs and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), and safety through monitoring device incidents.

Results: Minimal changes in HRQoL and clinical outcomes were observed over 6 months. A noteworthy 92.4% of patients actively used the platform in the first month, maintaining high usage throughout the study. Patient satisfaction was substantial, with more than half of the patients expressing excellence in service quality, willingness to reuse the platform, and fulfilment of their needs. Health coach interaction was high, with 76% of patients initiating contact within the first week. User retention rates were 70%, with prevalent ongoing usage and interaction with healthcare professionals even after the study. In terms of HCRU and costs, the study showed no significant changes in PAH-related hospital admissions, clinical visits, or tests. Finally, the low number of device-related incidents indicated platform safety.

Conclusion: This pilot study provides compelling evidence supporting the feasibility and acceptability of the PAHcare™ digital platform to empower patients to manage their disease and significantly enhance their overall experience with PAH.

Keywords: digital intervention platform; electronic patient-reported outcome; health services research; mobile health (mHealth); patient support program; pulmonary arterial hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PE has received consulting and lecture fees by Ferrer Internacional S.A. (Barcelona, Spain), Gossamer Bio., AOP Health, Janssen, and MSD. GP has received consulting fees by Ferrer Internacional S.A. (Barcelona, Spain). RA, HM, and GB are employees of Ferrer Internacional (Barcelona, Spain). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the CBS-PAH study. CEP, cost evaluable population; EP, evaluable population; EP PP, evaluable population per protocol; FAS, full analysis set.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in the EmPHAsis-10 and EQ-5D-5L scores during the study follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in the percentage of signs and symptoms of PAH experienced by the patients throughout the study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of the CSQ-8 questionnaire on the patient’s satisfaction with the use of the PAHcare™ platform.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Proportion of patients accessing the PAHcare™ platform by month of use. (B) Number of activity logs to the platform by month.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Proportion of patients with contacts-chats with the health coach by month. (B) Mean number of chat lines per week.

References

    1. Emmons-Bell S, Johnson C, Boon-Dooley A, Corris PA, Leary PJ, Rich S, et al. . Prevalence, incidence, and survival of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review for the global burden of disease 2020 study. Pulm Circ. (2022) 12:e12020. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12020, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humbert M, Guignabert C, Bonnet S, Dorfmüller P, Klinger JR, Nicolls MR, et al. . Pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: state of the art and research perspectives. Eur Respir J. (2019) 53:1801887. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01887-2018, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delcroix M, Howard L. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: the burden of disease and impact on quality of life. Eur Respir Rev. (2015) 24:621–9. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0063-2015, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zozaya N, Abdalla F, Casado Moreno I, Crespo-Diz C, Ramírez Gallardo AM, Rueda Soriano J, et al. . The economic burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Spain. BMC Pulm Med. (2022) 22:105. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01906-2, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, Badagliacca R, Berger RMF, Brida M, et al. . 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. (2022) 43:3618–731. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac237, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources