Navigating whiteness: affective relational intensities of non-clinical psychosocial support by and for culturally and linguistically diverse people
- PMID: 38435331
- PMCID: PMC10906108
- DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1282938
Navigating whiteness: affective relational intensities of non-clinical psychosocial support by and for culturally and linguistically diverse people
Abstract
Mental health is political, with intersecting economic, cultural, racialized, and affective dimensions making up the care assemblage, signalling how care is conceptualised and who is deserving of care. In this article, we examine emotions circulating in a non-clinical psychosocial support program for culturally and linguistically diverse people experiencing mental ill-health, foregrounding the relations between culture, race, economy, and assumptions underpinning understandings of care. The mental health program under study offers psychosocial support for culturally and linguistically diverse people to manage life challenges and mental ill-health exacerbated by navigating the complexities of Australia's health and social care systems. We draw on interviews with clients, staff, and providers of intersecting services, employing Ahmed's concept of affective economies and Savreemootoo's concept of navigating whiteness to examine the care assemblage within interview transcripts. We provide insight into affective intensities such as hate, anger, and indifference embedded in white Anglo-centric services, positioning culturally and linguistically diverse people on the margins of care. Non-clinical psychosocial support programs can counter such affective intensities by training and employing multicultural peer support workers-people with lived experience-prioritising relational and place-based approaches to care and supporting and providing clients with relevant skills to navigate an Anglo-centric care system. However, this support is filled with affective tensions: (com)passion, frustration and fatigue circulate and clash due to the scarcity of resources, further signalling what type of care (and with/for whom) is prioritised within Australian relations of care.
Keywords: affective economies; culturally and linguistically diverse communities; mental health; psychosocial support; whiteness.
Copyright © 2024 Mescouto, Olson, Plage, Zulfiqar, Setchell, Dune, Suleman, Cummins, Prasad-Ildes and Costa.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
References
-
- Aagaard J. (2021). Troubling the troublemakers: three challenges to post-qualitative inquiry. Int. Rev. Qualitative Res. 15, 311–325. doi: 10.1177/19408447211052668 - DOI
-
- Ahmed S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text 22, 117–139. doi: 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117 - DOI
-
- Ahmed S. (2015). The cultural politics of emotion. 2nd Edn. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
-
- American Psychological Association . (2018). Cultural blindness. Retrieved April 4, 2023 from https://dictionary.apa.org/cultural-blindness
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
