Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 16:11:1364815.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1364815. eCollection 2024.

Effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on liver and breast muscle fat deposition, lipid levels, and lipid metabolism-related gene expression in ducks

Affiliations

Effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on liver and breast muscle fat deposition, lipid levels, and lipid metabolism-related gene expression in ducks

Hongzhi Wu et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Exogenous supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid can mechanistically regulate the energy distribution in muscle cells. This study aimed to investigate the effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on liver and breast muscle fat deposition, lipid levels, and lipid metabolism-related gene expression in ducks. We randomly divided 480 42 days-old female Jiaji ducks into four groups with six replicates and 20 ducks for each replicate. The control group was fed the basal diet, and the experimental groups were fed the basal diet with 400, 600, and 800 mg/kg (GA400, GA600, and GA800) guanidinoacetic acid, respectively. Compared with the control group, (1) the total cholesterol (p = 0.0262), triglycerides (p = 0.0357), malondialdehyde (p = 0.0452) contents were lower in GA400, GA600 and GA800 in the liver; (2) the total cholesterol (p = 0.0365), triglycerides (p = 0.0459), and malondialdehyde (p = 0.0326) contents in breast muscle were decreased in GA400, GA600 and GA800; (3) the high density lipoprotein (p = 0.0356) and apolipoprotein-A1 (p = 0.0125) contents were increased in GA600 in the liver; (4) the apolipoprotein-A1 contents (p = 0.0489) in breast muscle were higher in GA600 and GA800; (5) the lipoprotein lipase contents (p = 0.0325) in the liver were higher in GA600 and GA800; (6) the malate dehydrogenase contents (p = 0.0269) in breast muscle were lower in GA400, GA600, and GA800; (7) the insulin induced gene 1 (p = 0.0326), fatty acid transport protein 1 (p = 0.0412), and lipoprotein lipase (p = 0.0235) relative expression were higher in GA400, GA600, and GA800 in the liver; (8) the insulin induced gene 1 (p = 0.0269), fatty acid transport protein 1 (p = 0.0234), and lipoprotein lipase (p = 0.0425) relative expression were increased in GA400, GA600, and GA800 in breast muscle. In this study, the optimum dosage of 600 mg/kg guanidinoacetic acid improved the liver and breast muscle fat deposition, lipid levels, and lipid metabolism-related gene expression in ducks.

Keywords: fat deposition; fatty acid composition; guanidinoacetic acid; lipase activity; lipid metabolism genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

QS was employed by the Hainan Xuhuai Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of guanidinoacetic acid on lipid levels in ducks. The data in CG, GA400, GA600 and GA800 were (A) total cholesterol (mmol/L) in the liver 5.49 ± 0.34a, 4.70 ± 0.46b, 3.71 ± 0.24c, 3.68 ± 0.23c, respectively, p = 0.0262; and in breast muscle 4.92 ± 0.20a, 4.51 ± 0.12b, 3.81 ± 0.25c, 3.40 ± 0.12d, respectively, p = 0.0365; (B) triglycerides (mmol/L) in the liver 1.67 ± 0.05a, 1.48 ± 0.04b, 1.39 ± 0.02c, 1.36 ± 0.05c, respectively, p = 0.0357; and in breast muscle 1.93 ± 0.03a, 1.70 ± 0.05b, 1.40 ± 0.04c, 1.39 ± 0.02c, respectively, p = 0.0459; (C) phospholipid (mg/g) in the liver 0.92 ± 0.02c, 1.15 ± 0.03b, 1.30 ± 0.10a, 1.14 ± 0.04b, respectively, P = 0.0456; and in breast 1.09 ± 0.03d, 1.15 ± 0.02c, 1.36 ± 0.11a, 1.20 ± 0.01b, respectively, p = 0.0431; (D) malondialdehyde (mmol/L) in the liver 4.91 ± 0.10a, 4.55 ± 0.18b, 4.13 ± 0.21c, 4.12 ± 0.22c, respectively, p = 0.0452; in breast muscle 4.90 ± 0.32a, 4.30 ± 0.21b, 4.25 ± 0.23b, 3.83 ± 0.09c, respectively, p = 0.0326; (E) intramuscular fat (%) in breast muscle 3.15 ± 0.15b, 3.49 ± 0.06a, 3.49 ± 0.04a, 3.49 ± 0.09a, respectively, p = 0.0235; (F) abdominal fat percentage (%) of ducks 3.77 ± 0.11a, 3.44 ± 0.06b, 3.21 ± 0.04c, 3.23 ± 0.05c, respectively, p = 0.0249; (G) creatine contents in breast muscle 3,920 ± 30.59c, 4,127 ± 26.85b, 4,689 ± 30.24a, 4,691 ± 38.67a, respectively, p = 0.0358.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of guanidinoacetic acid on lipid metabolism-related gene expression in ducks. The data in CG, GA400, GA600, and GA800 were (A) SCD (stearoyl CoA desaturase) in the liver 1.00 ± 0.01, 0.99 ± 0.01; 0.99 ± 0.01, 1.01 ± 0.01, respectively, p = 0.3236; and in breast muscle 1.00 ± 0.01, 1.01 ± 0.01, 1.01 ± 0.01, 0.99 ± 0.01, respectively, p = 0.6328; (B) INSIG1 (insulin induced gene 1) in the liver 1.00 ± 0.01c, 1.23 ± 0.02b, 1.31 ± 0.02a, 1.3 ± 0.03a, respectively, p = 0.0326; and in breast muscle 1 ± 0.01c, 1.34 ± 0.02b, 1.42 ± 0.03a, 1.42 ± 0.02a, respectively, p = 0.0269; (C) FATP1 (fatty acid transport protein 1) in the liver 1 ± 0.01b, 1.62 ± 0.03a, 1.63 ± 0.02a, 1.64 ± 0.03a, respectively, p = 0.0412; and in breast muscle 1.00 ± 0.01b, 1.53 ± 0.02a, 1.52 ± 0.03a, 1.54 ± 0.02a, respectively, p = 0.0234; (D) LPL (lipoprotein lipase) in the liver 1.00 ± 0.01c, 1.23 ± 0.01b, 1.45 ± 0.03a, 1.46 ± 0.03a, respectively, p = 0.0235; and in breast muscle 1 ± 0.01c, 1.29 ± 0.03b, 1.52 ± 0.02a, 1.54 ± 0.04a, respectively, p = 0.0425; (E) FAS (fatty acid synthetase) in the liver 1.00 ± 0.01a, 0.86 ± 0.02b, 0.73 ± 0.02c, 0.71 ± 0.03c, respectively, p = 0.0235; and in breast muscle 1.00 ± 0.01a, 0.76 ± 0.01b, 0.65 ± 0.02c, 0.63 ± 0.03c, respectively, p = 0.0349; (F) FFAR4 (free fatty acid receptor 4) in the liver 1 ± 0.01, 0.99 ± 0.02, 1.01 ± 0.02, 1.01 ± 0.03, respectively, p = 0.5236; and in 1.00 ± 0.01, 0.99 ± 0.01, 1.02 ± 0.03, 1.01 ± 0.02, respectively, p = 0.4571.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lim SA, Su W, Chapman NM, Chi H. Lipid metabolism in T cell signaling and function. Nat Chem Biol. (2022) 18:470–81. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01017-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeBose-Boyd RA. Significance and regulation of lipid metabolism. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2018) 81:97. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.12.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lei Q, Yang J, Li L, Zhao N, Lu C, Lu A, et al. . Lipid metabolism and rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1190607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190607, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bacci M, Lorito N, Smiriglia A, Morandi A. Fat and furious: lipid metabolism in antitumoral therapy response and resistance. Trends Cancer. (2021) 7:198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.004, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forbes SC, Cordingley DM, Cornish SM, Gualano B, Roschel H, Ostojic SM, et al. . Effects of creatine supplementation on brain function and health. Nutrients. (2022) 14:921. doi: 10.3390/nu14050921, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed