Family Physicians' Perspectives and Practices on Advance Care Planning in Regional Cities in Japan and the United States: A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Study
- PMID: 38435895
- PMCID: PMC10905047
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53260
Family Physicians' Perspectives and Practices on Advance Care Planning in Regional Cities in Japan and the United States: A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Study
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been widely recognized and practiced worldwide since the 1990s. However, only a few studies have compared clinicians' international perceptions of and experiences with ACP. Therefore, this study explored the perceptions and practices of family physicians (FPs) regarding ACP in Japan and the United States.
Methods: We conducted a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using a cross-sectional web-based anonymous questionnaire survey to examine how the perceptions and practices of ACP differ between Japanese and American FPs working in regional cities.
Results: Responses from 20 and 19 FPs in Japan and the United States were obtained, respectively. Both FP groups received ACP training during their residency and practiced ACP with the highest regard for the patient's wishes and values. Quantitative analysis revealed that American FPs placed more emphasis on documentation and patient language skills. Qualitative analysis revealed that Japanese FPs equally emphasized communication with patients' families and with patients. We merged the results of both analyses and hypothesized that the variations in the FPs' approaches to ACP might reflect variations in their backgrounds, such as health insurance systems, cultures, and values in the two countries, rather than differences between individual physicians.
Conclusion: Our study showed that both Japanese and American FPs respect patients' wishes in ACP, with some differences in their perceptions and practices. Therefore, FPs should understand and be flexible with their patients' values and cultural backgrounds as intercultural translators while following appropriate management procedures for successful ACP.
Keywords: advance care planning; convergent parallel mixed method; cross-national research; family medicine; family physician (fp); japan; the united states.
Copyright © 2024, Kita et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Advance care planning as a process: structuring the discussions in practice. Emanuel LL, Danis M, Pearlman RA, Singer PA. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:440–446. - PubMed
-
- Physicians' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: a comparison between seven countries. Miccinesi G, Fischer S, Paci E, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1961–1974. - PubMed
-
- Assessing the knowledge, perceptions and practices in advance care planning: a comparison between American and Japanese physicians. Freshman B, Yao A. Hos Pal Med Int Jnl. 2017;1:43–47.
-
- Development and psychometric properties of a survey to assess barriers to implementing advance care planning in primary care. Howard M, Day AG, Bernard C, Tan A, You J, Klein D, Heyland DK. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55:12–21. - PubMed
-
- Barriers to advance care planning among patients with advanced serious illnesses: a national survey of health-care professionals in Singapore. Malhotra C, Chaudhry I. Palliat Support Care. 2023:1–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous