Anesthesia Approach to Managing Severe Hemorrhagic Shock and Anemia With Non-transfusion Alternatives in a Practicing Jehovah's Witness: A Case Report
- PMID: 38435957
- PMCID: PMC10905204
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53301
Anesthesia Approach to Managing Severe Hemorrhagic Shock and Anemia With Non-transfusion Alternatives in a Practicing Jehovah's Witness: A Case Report
Abstract
Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is a common yet life-threatening occurrence across the United States and is typically managed with blood transfusions as the standard of care. However, providers caring for a Jehovah's Witness patient who refuses transfusions due to religious reasons face unique ethical challenges in upholding evidence-based shock resuscitation protocols while respecting the patient's autonomy and faith-based stance that strictly prohibits blood products. We present a complex clinical case of a 46-year-old Jehovah's Witness who developed severe hemorrhagic shock, partial amputation, and critical anemia after a traumatic 40-mile-per-hour motorcycle collision resulting in comminuted fractures and arterial disruption. Despite receiving emergent blood transfusions initially, further transfusions were declined once his identity as a practicing Jehovah's Witness was disclosed. His hemoglobin plunged to dangerously low levels of 4.6 g/dL before stabilizing to 5.3 g/dL with pharmaceutical alternatives including intravenous iron, high-dose erythropoietin, and phlebotomy minimization. Respecting patient convictions while delivering effective evidence-based shock management created significant ethical conflicts given the proven efficacy of blood transfusions. However, this complex case demonstrates that through meticulous medical and surgical care coordinated by a multi-disciplinary team applying customized non-transfusion techniques, traumatic hemorrhagic shock and life-threatening anemia can still achieve favorable outcomes without relying on transfusions when respecting faith-based refusal of blood products.
Keywords: blood transfusion; hemorrhagic shock; jehovah's witness; medical ethics; non-transfusion therapy; patient autonomy; patient-centered care; severe anemia; shared decision-making; trauma.
Copyright © 2024, Kirsch et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions. Bock GL. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:652–656. - PubMed
-
- Watchtower Approved Blood Transfusions. 2024. https://www.ajwrb.org/watchtower-approved-blood-transfusions https://www.ajwrb.org/watchtower-approved-blood-transfusions
-
- A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Hébert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:409–417. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources