Does central venous stenosis affects the brachial artery flow volume and peripheral vascular resistive index in patients on maintenance hemodialysis? A retrospective study
- PMID: 38436100
- DOI: 10.1177/11297298231226427
Does central venous stenosis affects the brachial artery flow volume and peripheral vascular resistive index in patients on maintenance hemodialysis? A retrospective study
Abstract
Background: A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is crucial for the patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Central venous stenosis (CVS) is a common, yet, overlooked complication of VA as its diagnosis is challenging. Moreover, its effect on the flow volume (FV) and the peripheral resistive index (RI) was not well discussed before. Despite the availability of doppler ultrasound (DUS) in most centers, direct visualization of central veins using DUS is quite difficult.
Methods: This is a retrospective single-center self-controlled cohort study that was conducted in a specialized vascular access management tertiary center in Japan and included all patients with CVS who underwent percutaneous transluminal angiography (PTA) with or without vascular stenting in the period from January 2014 to September 2022. The patients were divided according to their VA type into arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and arteriovenous graft (AVG) groups, then subdivided, according to the type of stenosis, into two subgroups: CVS, and mixed central and peripheral venous stenosis (MVS) groups. The FV and RI of the feeding artery were compared in the same procedure before and after PTA to assess the impact of the procedure itself.
Results: Data of 485 percutaneous transluminal angiography procedures (PTA), performed in 95 patients during the period from January 2014 to September 2022, were collected. FV and RI were significantly affected in the patients with MVS than patients with CVS. After PTA, both FV and RI were significantly improved. The improvement rate of FV and RI after PTA were significantly higher in patients with MVS than patients with CVS. However, it was difficult to determine the cut-off value to diagnose or to assess the improvement of CVS.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that FV and RI measurement by DUS are good tools, along with the clinical findings for assessment of CVS in certain situations.
Keywords: Central veins; FV; RI; duplex; flow volume; resistive index; stenosis; ultrasound; vascular access.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Postoperative day 1 access blood flow and resistive index can predict patency in distal forearm arteriovenous fistula.J Vasc Access. 2017 Sep 11;18(5):371-378. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000777. Epub 2017 Aug 2. J Vasc Access. 2017. PMID: 28777399
-
Standard procedures of endovascular treatment for vascular access stenosis in our facility - clinical usefulness of ultrasonography.J Vasc Access. 2015 Nov;16 Suppl 10:S34-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000460. Epub 2015 Sep 5. J Vasc Access. 2015. PMID: 26349878
-
The forearm arteriovenous graft between the brachial artery and the brachial vein as a reliable dialysis vascular access for patients with inadequate superficial veins.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):199-207.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.101. Epub 2019 Mar 17. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30894304
-
Color Doppler ultrasound evaluation of arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis.J Vasc Access. 2024 Nov;25(6):1721-1740. doi: 10.1177/11297298231178588. Epub 2023 Oct 9. J Vasc Access. 2024. PMID: 37814457 Review.
-
Surveillance of arteriovenous accesses with the use of duplex Doppler ultrasonography.J Vasc Access. 2014;15 Suppl 7:S28-32. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000240. Epub 2014 Apr 17. J Vasc Access. 2014. PMID: 24817451 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical