Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 May 1;184(5):528-536.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037.

Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tilmann Schober et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in Results and Discussion.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):707. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1450. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38648054 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear.

Objective: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment.

Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing.

Data extraction and synthesis: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.

Main outcomes and measures: Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs.

Results: Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further studies in adults, especially those with high-risk conditions, are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Clark reported nonfinancial support from Biomerieux/Biofire and Qiagen; grants from Biomerieux/Biofire, Sense Bio, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Norwegian Research Council; and personal fees from Biomerieux/Biofire, Qiagen, Cepheid, Medscape, Janssen, Sanofi, Roche, Shionogi, GSK, and Seqirus outside the submitted work. Dr Robinson reported personal fees from Elsevier and the Alberta Pharmacists' Association outside the submitted work. Dr Papenburg reported grants and personal fees from Merck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, and grants from MedImmune outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Flow Diagram of Included and Excluded Articles
aOne study not included as it only reported changes in proportional management without providing absolute numbers. ED indicates emergency department; RCT, randomized clinical trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Association of Rapid Viral (RV) Testing and a Positive vs Negative RV Test Result With Antibiotic Use

Comment in

References

    1. Monto AS. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections. Am J Med. 2002;112(suppl 6A):4S-12S. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(01)01058-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hersh AL, Jackson MA, Hicks LA; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases . Principles of judicious antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2013;132(6):1146-1154. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, et al. . Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(10):e51-e77. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chow EJ, Uyeki TM, Chu HY. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community respiratory virus activity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(3):195-210. doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00807-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JJ, Verbakel JY, Goyder CR, et al. . The clinical utility of point-of-care tests for influenza in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(1):24-33. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy837 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms