Human estimates of descending objects' motion are more accurate than those of ascending objects regardless of gravity information
- PMID: 38436983
- PMCID: PMC10913939
- DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.3.2
Human estimates of descending objects' motion are more accurate than those of ascending objects regardless of gravity information
Abstract
Humans can accurately estimate and track object motion, even if it accelerates. Research shows that humans exhibit superior estimation and tracking performance for descending (falling) than ascending (rising) objects. Previous studies presented ascending and descending targets along the gravitational and body axes in an upright posture. Thus, it is unclear whether humans rely on congruent information between the direction of the target motion and gravity or the direction of the target motion and longitudinal body axes. Two experiments were conducted to explore these possibilities. In Experiment 1, participants estimated the arrival time at a goal for both upward and downward motion of targets along the longitudinal body axis in the upright (both axes of target motion and gravity congruent) and supine (both axes incongruent) postures. In Experiment 2, smooth pursuit eye movements were assessed while tracking both targets in the same postures. Arrival time estimation and smooth pursuit eye movement performance were consistently more accurate for downward target motion than for upward motion, irrespective of posture. These findings suggest that the visual experience of seeing an object moving along an observer's leg side in everyday life may influence the ability to accurately estimate and track the descending object's motion.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Impaired visual perceptual accuracy in the upper visual field induces asymmetric performance in position estimation for falling and rising objects.J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.1. J Vis. 2025. PMID: 39745716 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of body posture on long-range time-to-contact estimation.Perception. 2011;40(6):674-81. doi: 10.1068/p6945. Perception. 2011. PMID: 21936296
-
Effects of visual motion consistent or inconsistent with gravity on postural sway.Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jul;235(7):1999-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4942-3. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28326440
-
The role of areas MT and MST in coding of visual motion underlying the execution of smooth pursuit.Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 May 27. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18508104 Review.
-
Visual perception and interception of falling objects: a review of evidence for an internal model of gravity.J Neural Eng. 2005 Sep;2(3):S198-208. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S04. Epub 2005 Aug 31. J Neural Eng. 2005. PMID: 16135884 Review.
Cited by
-
Impaired visual perceptual accuracy in the upper visual field induces asymmetric performance in position estimation for falling and rising objects.J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.1. J Vis. 2025. PMID: 39745716 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical