Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study
- PMID: 38437191
- PMCID: PMC10921966
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943286
Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND The modified shock index (MSI) is calculated as the ratio of heart rate (HR) to mean arterial pressure (MAP) and has been used to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) in trauma patients. This retrospective study from a single center aimed to compare the MSI with the traditional shock index (SI) to predict the need for MT in 612 women diagnosed with primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) at the Emergency Department (ED) between January 2004 and August 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patients were divided into the MT group and the non-MT group. The predictive power of MSI and SI was compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS Out of 612 patients, 105 (17.2%) required MT. The MT group had higher median values than the non-MT group for MSI (1.58 vs 1.07, P<0.001) and SI (1.22 vs 0.80, P<0.001). The AUC for MSI, with a value of 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.778-0.841), did not demonstrate a significant difference compared to the AUC for SI, which was 0.829 (95% CI, 0.797-0.858) (P=0.066). The optimal cutoff values for MSI and SI were 1.34 and 1.07, respectively. The specificity and PPV for MT were 77.1% and 40.2% for MSI, and 83.2% and 45.9% for SI. CONCLUSIONS Both MSI and SI were effective in predicting MT in patients with primary PPH. However, MSI did not demonstrate superior performance to SI.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 5;13(7):683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070683. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27399737 Free PMC article.
-
Delta neutrophil index and shock index can stratify risk for the requirement for massive transfusion in patients with primary postpartum hemorrhage in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0258619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258619. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34653202 Free PMC article.
-
An increase in initial shock index is associated with the requirement for massive transfusion in emergency department patients with primary postpartum hemorrhage.Shock. 2013 Aug;40(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31829b1778. Shock. 2013. PMID: 23707978
-
Importance of shock index in the evaluation of postpartum hemorrhage cases that necessitate blood transfusion.Women Health. 2020 Oct;60(9):1070-1078. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1802638. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Women Health. 2020. PMID: 32757719
-
Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2023 Mar 5;27(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w. Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 36872322 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Utility of shock index for predicting severity of postpartum haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2133-2143. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12276. Pak J Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40735585 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, et al. Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;38(2):119–24. - PubMed
-
- Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, et al. Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1448–52. - PubMed
-
- Strote J, Mayo M, Townes D. ED patient estimation of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(6):709–11. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources