Peripheral artery disease recognition, diagnosis, and management in general practice in the Republic of Ireland and England: an online survey
- PMID: 38438198
- PMCID: PMC11300980
- DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0150
Peripheral artery disease recognition, diagnosis, and management in general practice in the Republic of Ireland and England: an online survey
Abstract
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common and associated with future cardiovascular events. PAD is underdiagnosed, which limits opportunities to address secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It is unknown how closely guidelines for detection of PAD are followed in primary care.
Aim: To survey GPs' attitudes to diagnosis and follow-up of patients with PAD.
Design & setting: Online survey of GPs in England and the Republic of Ireland (RoI).
Method: GPs' approaches to management of PAD were assessed using likelihood ratings (scales of 0-10) and discrete questions. Findings were summarised as proportions, or median and interquartile ranges (IQR).
Results: In total, 111 responses were analysed; 68 (61%) from England and 43 (39%) from the RoI. Considering a hypothetical patient at risk of PAD, likelihood of GPs enquiring about PAD symptoms (leg pains: 3/10 or erectile dysfunction: 2/10) was low. GPs in the RoI compared with GPs in England more often examined the heart (10/10 versus 7/10) or carotid vessels (5/10 versus 1/10). Lower limb pulses were palpated in response to symptoms or signs of PAD. In England 25% of practitioners, and in the RoI 55% of practitioners, reported that they do not measure ankle-brachial index (ABI).
Conclusion: Currently, detection of PAD is generally triggered by 'classical' leg claudication symptoms, while known vascular risk factors appear to elicit little consideration. ABI measurement is not performed by many practitioners, suggesting that a proportion of vascular referrals must be based on history and examination findings alone. Opportunities to recognise PAD are missed.
Keywords: blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; general practitioners; peripheral arterial disease; primary healthcare.
Copyright © 2024, The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
CEC, VA, SD and the EuoPAD investigators were supported by honoraria from Bayer AG. CEC has received honoraria from ReCor medical for unrelated work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074395 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to screening and diagnosis of peripheral artery disease by general practitioners.Vasc Med. 2013 Dec;18(6):325-30. doi: 10.1177/1358863X13505673. Epub 2013 Oct 8. Vasc Med. 2013. PMID: 24105616
-
Limited Adherence to Peripheral Arterial Disease Guidelines and Suboptimal Ankle Brachial Index Reliability in Dutch Primary Care.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;55(6):867-873. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29576335
-
Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment.Am Fam Physician. 2019 Mar 15;99(6):362-369. Am Fam Physician. 2019. PMID: 30874413 Review.
-
Does the clinical examination predict lower extremity peripheral arterial disease?JAMA. 2006 Feb 1;295(5):536-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.5.536. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16449619 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources