Outcomes of etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants: A single center cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38438213
- PMCID: PMC11115393
- DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.3.20230840
Outcomes of etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants: A single center cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the prevalence of menstrual irregularities, side effects, and discontinuation rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants (ESI) in women attending King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: This cross-sectional was carried out based on electronic medical records and a phone-based questionnaire administered to women who underwent ESI insertion in a single tertiary care hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2019 and 2022. The primary objective was the prevalence of menstrual abnormalities. The secondary study objective included the discontinuation rate, reasons for discontinuation, and ESI side effects.
Results: In total, 345 women with ESI were included in this study. The prevalence of any type of menstrual abnormalities was 88%. Other side effects included skin and mood changes, arm pain, and numbness. The discontinuation rate was 11% in the first year and 22% before the completion of 36 months.
Conclusion: Although menstrual abnormalities are a common side effect of ESI, only 22% of users discontinued this method of contraception.
Keywords: contraception; etonogestrel; implants; menstrual abnormalities.
Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.
Similar articles
-
Subdermal contraceptive implants.J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995 Jun;53(1-6):223-6. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00051-z. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995. PMID: 7626459 Review.
-
Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion-a randomized controlled equivalence trial.Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2484-2490. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew238. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27664217 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1393-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu089. Epub 2014 May 8. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 24812309 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety, efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital.Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;13(3):331-5. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20857796
-
Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)05016-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8178903 Review.
References
-
- Organon N. V.. NEXPLANON® and IMPLANON® (etonogestrel implant). [Updated 2011; accessed date?]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/021529s011lbl.pdf
-
- Maddox DD, Rahman Z. Etonogestrel (Implanon), another treatment option for contraception. P T 2008. Jun;33: 337-347.
-
- Bahamondes L, Brache V, Meirik O, Ali M, Habib N, Landoulsi S.. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2527-2538. - PubMed
-
- Aisien AO, Safety Enosolease ME., efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Niger J Clin Pract 2010; 13: 331-335. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources