Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):681.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18017-8.

Development and feasibility of a function-based preventive intervention for lifestyle-related disorders

Lena Bornhöft  1   2   3 , Daniel Arvidsson  4 , Anna Bergenheim  5   6 , Mats Börjesson  7   8 , Jonatan Fridolfsson  4 , Margareta Hellgren  9   10 , Lena Nordeman  5   6 , Maria Eh Larsson  5   6
Affiliations

Development and feasibility of a function-based preventive intervention for lifestyle-related disorders

Lena Bornhöft et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The enormous effect of lifestyle-related disorders on health of the global population warrants the development of preventive interventions. Focusing on musculoskeletal health and physical activity may be a way to encourage necessary lifestyle changes by making them more concrete and understandable. The aims of the current study were to develop a function-based preventive intervention aimed at lifestyle-related disorders in physically inactive 40-year-old people and to investigate the feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility study aimed to solve practical and logistical challenges and to develop the intervention based on the experiences of participants and involved clinical personnel according to defined criteria.

Methods: Development of the standardised functional examination was based on literature-validated tests and clinical reasoning. Development of a risk profile was based on the functional examination and similar profiles which have already proved feasible. The feasibility of the functional examination and risk profile, together with function-based lifestyle counselling was tested on 27 participants in a pilot study with two physiotherapist examinations over a four-month period. Practical results and feedback from participants and collaborating personnel were examined.

Results: The functional examination consists of 20 established tests not requiring specialised equipment or training which were deemed relevant for a middle-aged population and a sub-maximal ergometer test. The risk profile consists of seven functional dimensions: cardiovascular fitness, strength in upper extremity, lower extremity and trunk, mobility, balance and posture, and three non-functional dimensions: weight, self-assessed physical activity and pain. Each dimension contains at least two measures. The participants appreciated the intervention and found it motivating for making lifestyle changes. They found the tests and risk profile understandable and could see them as tools to help achieve concrete goals. The examination required 60-75 min for one physiotherapist. The recruitment rate was low and recruited participants were highly motivated to making lifestyle changes.

Conclusion: This project developed a functional test battery and risk profile aimed at inactive 40-year-olds which fulfilled our feasibility criteria. Functional screening and lifestyle counselling were found to be of value to a sub-group of inactive 40-year-olds who were already motivated to improve their health situations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05535296 first posted on 10/09/2022.

Keywords: Function; Lifestyle-related disorders; Physical activity; Prevention; Risk profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant values, reference values and maximum values on the risk profile
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lewis R, Gomez Alvarez CB, Rayman M, Lanham-New S, Woolf A, Mobasheri A. Strategies for optimising musculoskeletal health in the 21(St) century. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2510-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e86. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Life expectancy and disease burden in the Nordic countries: results from the Global Burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(12):e658–e69. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30224-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crosland P, Ananthapavan J, Davison J, Lambert M, Carter R. The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(5):484–95. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12925. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schäfer I, Hansen H, Ruppel T, Lühmann D, Wagner HO, Kazek A, et al. Regional differences in reasons for consultation and general practitioners’ spectrum of services in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1093-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data