Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):234.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05166-y.

Unleashing excellence: using a project management approach to effectively implement a simulation curriculum to improve residents' preparedness

Affiliations

Unleashing excellence: using a project management approach to effectively implement a simulation curriculum to improve residents' preparedness

Claudia Ebm et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Integrating innovative, simulation-based training programs into medical curricula frequently encounters familiar challenges, including scepticism, limited faculty time, and financial constraints. Recognized for its success in business projects, the Harvard Project Management Theory emerges as a promising approach to optimizing the implementation process and achieving sustainable success. This study endeavours to elucidate the application of project management theory in our implementation process and assess its impact on the clinical preparedness of novice residents.

Methods: The research utilized a structured four-phase implementation strategy-Planning, Build-up, Execution, and Closing-to develop a simulation-based education curriculum. Incorporating project management tools like project charters and risk management tools played a crucial role in facilitating the effective implementation of standardized processes and improved clinical outcomes. Essential components of this innovative management approach encompass stakeholder engagement, milestone definition, and the alignment of institutional policies and processes.

Results: A collective of 395 residents actively engaged in eight monthly simulation-based events, reflecting an average participation rate of 39 residents per lecture (± 19). A noteworthy enhancement was observed in the average rating for knowledge gain, with a significant improvement from 5.9/10 to 8.8/10 (p = 0.0001). Participants highlighted the program's considerable impact on future clinical practice (4.7/5) and teamwork (4.8/5) as particularly valuable aspects. The introduction of a novel organizational structure received favourable feedback from faculty members, with a notable rating of 4.8/5 for predictive time planning. Qualitative insights from the evaluation highlighted the significance of targeted incentive schemes in optimizing the implementation process.

Conclusion: This project underscores the constructive influence of project management principles in designing simulation-based curricula, explicitly focusing on stakeholder engagement, faculty motivation, and data utilization. Adopting the Harvard Project Management Approach emerges as a catalyst for heightened success in curriculum design, contributing to enhanced emergency preparedness among novice residents. The positive outcomes observed in this study provide valuable insights for future implementations, offering a foundation for refining and optimizing medical education programs to meet the evolving needs of learners and stakeholders alike.

Keywords: Education; Emergency preparedness; Implementation science; Patient safety; Postgraduate training; Quality improvement; Simulation curriculum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts or competing interests regarding this study have been declared. The authors certify no conflicts of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
This figure illustrates the specific actions, stakeholders, and tools used to structure the distinct phases of the project effectively. *RAID: Risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies *GANTT chart: illustrates work completed over a period about the time planned for the work

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chan PG, Schaheen LW, Chan EG, Cook CC, Luketich JD, D’Cunha J. Technology-enhanced Simulation improves Trainee Readiness transitioning to cardiothoracic training. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(5). - PubMed
    1. Offiah G, Ekpotu LP, Murphy S, Kane D, Gordon A, O’Sullivan M et al. Evaluation of medical student retention of clinical skills following simulation training. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray H, Savage T, Rang L, Messenger D. Teaching diagnostic reasoning: using simulation and mixed practice to build competence. Can J Emerg Med. 2018;20(1). - PubMed
    1. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Wang AT, Cook DA. Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. 28, J Gen Intern Med. 2013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiello S, Cochrane T, Sevigny C. The affordances of clinical simulation immersive technology within healthcare education: a scoping review. Virtual Real. 2023. - PMC - PubMed