Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53503.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.53503. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Male Youth Tobacco Usage Pattern in Banned Smoking Area in Comparison With Non-banned Smoking Area: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Male Youth Tobacco Usage Pattern in Banned Smoking Area in Comparison With Non-banned Smoking Area: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abduallah Zaid M Alzaidy. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of smoking bans in schools on smoking prevalence and behavior among Saudi male youth aged 13-15 years.

Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted involving students from two intermediate schools in Jeddah - one with a smoking ban and the other without. Data collection utilized the Global Youth Tobacco Survey questionnaire, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0.

Results: The study had a 93.9% response rate, with 659 students participating. Notably, a lower percentage of ever-smoking was observed in the banned area compared to the non-banned area (39.6% vs. 50.9%; p=0.002). Current smoking rates were also lower in the banned area (14.2% vs. 23.8%; p=0.014). Family and peer influences on smoking were reduced in the banned area, and more students discussed the harmful effects of smoking with family (72.8% vs. 59.8%; p=0.003). Students in the non-banned area found it easier to access cigarettes. A significantly higher percentage of students in the banned area were resolute in not smoking if offered a cigarette by their best friend (65.0% vs. 59.2%; p=0.006). Students in the non-banned area reported higher exposure to cigarette smoke at home and in other places compared to those in the banned area (15.8% vs. 10.8%; p=0.008), respectively. A higher percentage of smokers in the banned area expressed a desire to quit smoking, though the difference was not statistically significant. More anti-smoking media messages were reported in the banned area (35.6% vs. 33.6%; p=0.004). Fewer respondents in the banned area had items with cigarette brand logos (13.6% vs. 19.9%; p=0.03).

Conclusion: The findings underscore the effectiveness of smoking bans in schools in reducing smoking prevalence among students. This suggests a broader societal shift in attitudes toward smoking, highlighting the need for comprehensive bans as part of public health strategies. However, there remains a need for targeted interventions to address the complexities of smoking behavior in both banned and non-banned areas.

Keywords: attitude; prevalence; preventive measures; saudi arabia; smoking ban area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study population distribution according to a) age, b) school level

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking 2000-2025. [ Aug; 2023 ]. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-report-on-trends-in-p... https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-report-on-trends-in-p...
    1. Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. The World Bank. Tob Control. 1999;8:196–201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017: Monitoring Tobacco Use and Prevention Policies. [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512824 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512824
    1. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. GBD 2015 Tobacco Collaborators. Lancet. 2017;389:1885–1906. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources