Male Youth Tobacco Usage Pattern in Banned Smoking Area in Comparison With Non-banned Smoking Area: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 38440037
- PMCID: PMC10911393
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53503
Male Youth Tobacco Usage Pattern in Banned Smoking Area in Comparison With Non-banned Smoking Area: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of smoking bans in schools on smoking prevalence and behavior among Saudi male youth aged 13-15 years.
Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted involving students from two intermediate schools in Jeddah - one with a smoking ban and the other without. Data collection utilized the Global Youth Tobacco Survey questionnaire, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0.
Results: The study had a 93.9% response rate, with 659 students participating. Notably, a lower percentage of ever-smoking was observed in the banned area compared to the non-banned area (39.6% vs. 50.9%; p=0.002). Current smoking rates were also lower in the banned area (14.2% vs. 23.8%; p=0.014). Family and peer influences on smoking were reduced in the banned area, and more students discussed the harmful effects of smoking with family (72.8% vs. 59.8%; p=0.003). Students in the non-banned area found it easier to access cigarettes. A significantly higher percentage of students in the banned area were resolute in not smoking if offered a cigarette by their best friend (65.0% vs. 59.2%; p=0.006). Students in the non-banned area reported higher exposure to cigarette smoke at home and in other places compared to those in the banned area (15.8% vs. 10.8%; p=0.008), respectively. A higher percentage of smokers in the banned area expressed a desire to quit smoking, though the difference was not statistically significant. More anti-smoking media messages were reported in the banned area (35.6% vs. 33.6%; p=0.004). Fewer respondents in the banned area had items with cigarette brand logos (13.6% vs. 19.9%; p=0.03).
Conclusion: The findings underscore the effectiveness of smoking bans in schools in reducing smoking prevalence among students. This suggests a broader societal shift in attitudes toward smoking, highlighting the need for comprehensive bans as part of public health strategies. However, there remains a need for targeted interventions to address the complexities of smoking behavior in both banned and non-banned areas.
Keywords: attitude; prevalence; preventive measures; saudi arabia; smoking ban area.
Copyright © 2024, Alzaidy et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Global Youth Tobacco Survey: 2001-2002 in Riyadh region, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2011 Nov 16;2:197-204. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S23626. eCollection 2011. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 24474857 Free PMC article.
-
Youth tobacco surveillance--United States, 2000.MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001 Nov 2;50(4):1-84. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001. PMID: 11902401
-
Global youth tobacco surveillance, 2000-2007.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008 Jan 25;57(1):1-28. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008. PMID: 18219269
-
Use of electronic cigarettes among secondary and high school students from a socially disadvantaged rural area in Poland.BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 3;15:703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3417-y. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27488357 Free PMC article.
-
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015. Tob Use Insights. 2015. PMID: 26242225 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking 2000-2025. [ Aug; 2023 ]. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-report-on-trends-in-p... https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-report-on-trends-in-p...
-
- WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017: Monitoring Tobacco Use and Prevention Policies. [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512824 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512824
-
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources