Printable devices for neurotechnology
- PMID: 38440397
- PMCID: PMC10909977
- DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1332827
Printable devices for neurotechnology
Abstract
Printable electronics for neurotechnology is a rapidly emerging field that leverages various printing techniques to fabricate electronic devices, offering advantages in rapid prototyping, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. These devices have promising applications in neurobiology, enabling the recording of neuronal signals and controlled drug delivery. This review provides an overview of printing techniques, materials used in neural device fabrication, and their applications. The printing techniques discussed include inkjet, screen printing, flexographic printing, 3D printing, and more. Each method has its unique advantages and challenges, ranging from precise printing and high resolution to material compatibility and scalability. Selecting the right materials for printable devices is crucial, considering factors like biocompatibility, flexibility, electrical properties, and durability. Conductive materials such as metallic nanoparticles and conducting polymers are commonly used in neurotechnology. Dielectric materials, like polyimide and polycaprolactone, play a vital role in device fabrication. Applications of printable devices in neurotechnology encompass various neuroprobes, electrocorticography arrays, and microelectrode arrays. These devices offer flexibility, biocompatibility, and scalability, making them cost-effective and suitable for preclinical research. However, several challenges need to be addressed, including biocompatibility, precision, electrical performance, long-term stability, and regulatory hurdles. This review highlights the potential of printable electronics in advancing our understanding of the brain and treating neurological disorders while emphasizing the importance of overcoming these challenges.
Keywords: microelectrode arrays; neuroprobes; neurotechnology; printable devices; printable electronics.
Copyright © 2024 Matta, Moreau and O’Connor.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Adly N., Weidlich S., Seyock S., Brings F., Yakushenko A., Offenhäusser A., et al. . (2018). Printed microelectrode arrays on soft materials: from PDMS to hydrogels. npj Flex Electron. 2:15. doi: 10.1038/s41528-018-0027-z - DOI
-
- Agarwala S., Goh G. L., Yeong W. Y. (2017). Optimizing aerosol jet printing process of silver ink for printed electronics. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 191:012027. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/191/1/012027 - DOI
-
- Aguilar S. M., Shea J. D., Al-Joumayly M. A., Van Veen B. D., Behdad N., Hagness S. C. (2012). Dielectric characterization of PCL-based thermoplastic materials for microwave diagnostic and therapeutic applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59:627. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2157918, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alonso G. A., Istamboulie G., Ramírez-García Alfredo A., Noguer T., Marty J. L., Muñoz R. (2010). Artificial neural network implementation in single low-cost chip for the detection of insecticides by modeling of screen-printed enzymatic sensors response. Comput. Electron. Agric. 74, 223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.08.003 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
