Comparative Study of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with or without Preservation of Nasal Mucosal Flap
- PMID: 38440443
- PMCID: PMC10908912
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04311-1
Comparative Study of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with or without Preservation of Nasal Mucosal Flap
Abstract
Objective: To analyse the result of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystrhinostomy with or without preservation of nasal mucosal flap.
Study design: Randomised prospective cohort design.
Setting: Tertiary academic centre.
Subjects and methods: 100 patients who presented with epiphora and diagnosed as chronic dacryocystitis after syringing by ophthalmologist, were selected and randomised into two groups. Standard surgical procedure of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was carried out except for the preservation of flap in group A and without preservation of flap in group B. Additional surgeries were done according to necessity. Postoperatively, patients were followed up on OPD-basis at the end of 1st week, 2nd week, 1st month, and 3rd month. Symptomatic improvement was assessed and patency checked by syringing by the ophthalmologist.
Results: Nil intraoperative complications (p < 0.05) and nil postoperative complication noted (p < 0.05). Functional and anatomical patency found to be 100% at the end of 1st week in both groups, 96% at 3rd month in case group A and 98%, 92% and 82% respectively at the end of 2nd week, 1st month and 3rd month in group B. Nasal endoscopy of all surgical failures showed restenosis in both groups and synechiae in 2 patients in group B.
Conclusions: Preservation of nasal mucosal flap with modification around stoma can be used to cover the bared bone with avoidance of granulation tissue formation reducing the risk of closure of ostium with large rhinostomy and improve success of endoscopic endonasal DCR.
Keywords: Dacryocystorhinostomy.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestAuthor 1 and Author 2 declares that there no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Improving the Results of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mitomycin C Application: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec;70(4):477-481. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1498-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 30464901 Free PMC article.
-
Innovative Use of Insulated Microear Ball Probe Cautery in Creation of Nasal Mucosal Flap in EnDCR.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;70(2):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1274-y. Epub 2018 Feb 17. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29977859 Free PMC article.
-
New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians.Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(6):704-7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.06.10. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 23275904 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Post-Surgical Therapies on Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020 Nov;34(6):846-856. doi: 10.1177/1945892420945218. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020. PMID: 32703027
-
Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy.Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):837-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.023. Ophthalmology. 2004. PMID: 15051221 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous