Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;34(12):1132-1146.
doi: 10.1177/10497323241231530. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients' Perceptions of an Interprofessional Counseling Service on Complementary and Integrative Healthcare

Affiliations

A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients' Perceptions of an Interprofessional Counseling Service on Complementary and Integrative Healthcare

Helena Dürsch et al. Qual Health Res. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Medical guidelines recommend actively addressing patients' information needs regarding complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH). Within the CCC-Integrativ study, an interprofessional counseling program on CIH was developed and implemented at four comprehensive cancer centers (CCCs) in Germany. As part of the process evaluation, this study examines cancer patients' experiences with interprofessional CIH counseling sessions conducted by a physician and a nurse. Forty problem-centered interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis based on Kuckartz and Rädiker's approach. Findings revealed that most participants had prior experience with CIH approaches and were burdened by physiological and psychological symptoms. Counseling sessions focused on cancer- and treatment-related symptoms and appropriate CIH recommendations (e.g., herbal poultice against anxieties and acupressure against nausea). Participants appreciated the mutual exchange and integration of perspectives from different healthcare professions within the interprofessional approach. They noted that the counseling team comprehensively addressed their healthcare and CIH information needs. Suggestions for improvement included the specificity of the CIH recommendations. As the participants only received counseling and no CIH treatments, information about reputable CIH providers was particularly important to many seeking advice. Patients with cancer receiving tailored CIH counseling from two healthcare professionals experienced benefits in CIH counseling for symptom management. The interprofessional teams offered a comprehensive perspective on patients' needs, proposing personalized recommendations for symptom control. These insights may foster collaboration between healthcare professionals interested in CIH counseling, enabling them to expand and consolidate their counseling services.

Keywords: cancer; complementary and integrative healthcare; counseling; doctor–patient and nurse–patient communication; holistic care; integrative oncology; interprofessional counseling; interprofessional healthcare; qualitative analysis; symptom management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Category system: patients’ perception of the interprofessional counseling program on complementary and integrative healthcare. Note. This figure demonstrates an integrative model of the main categories and subcategories of data analysis and their interrelations. This article covers the categories in the blue box (competencies, attitudes, and prior experience; counseling sessions; and interprofessional approach).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bauer M. S., Kirchner J. (2020). Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Research, 283, Article 112376. 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Arye E., Samuels N., Schiff E., Raz O. G., Sharabi I. S., Lavie O. (2015). Quality-of-life outcomes in patients with gynecologic cancer referred to integrative oncology treatment during chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23(12), 3411–3419. 10.1007/s00520-015-2690-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blödt S., Mittring N., Schützler L., Fischer F., Holmberg C., Horneber M., Stapf A., Witt C. M. (2016). A consultation training program for physicians for communication about complementary medicine with breast cancer patients: A prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized, mixed-method pilot study. BMC Cancer, 16(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s12885-016-2884-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonacchi A., Toccafondi A., Mambrini A., Cantore M., Muraca M. G., Focardi F., Lippi D., Miccinesi G. (2015). Complementary needs behind complementary therapies in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 24(9), 1124–1130. 10.1002/pon.3773 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bossert J., Korus B., Dürsch H., Boltenhagen U., Stie M., Klafke N. (2022). Qualitative methods for the evaluation of counseling sessions in oncology. Deutscher Krebskongress.

Publication types