Flap loss in head and neck reconstruction: Is there a singular cause for failure?

Abstract

Despite the high success rates reported in head and neck reconstruction, free flap failures continue to persist. Understanding the factors associated with flap loss and improving overall success are paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the factors influencing flap revision and free tissue transfer survival in head and neck reconstruction. The study included 70 patients with defects in the lower two-thirds of the head and neck region and underwent reconstruction using free flaps. Patient age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities and data on the location and aetiology of the defect, the specific type of flap employed, the recipient artery and vein chosen, instances of revision and the overall success of the flap were collected. The investigation aimed to establish correlations between these variables as well as flap success and revision rates. No statistically significant differences were observed in arterial and venous anastomosis revision rates, or flap survival, in relation to variables such as age, gender, flap type, smoking status, comorbidities, recipient artery or vein and the number of vein anastomoses. The malignant tumour group exhibited a lower requirement for arterial revision and a higher flap survival rate compared to the benign tumour group. This study underscores the comparable safety profiles of perforator-based and conventional flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Furthermore, it reveals that patient characteristics are not contraindications for free tissue transfer. Additionally, the quantity of the veins and choice of recipient vessels are flexible and do not significantly impact flap success. The higher rates of flap success in patients with malignant aetiology requires further investigation.

Keywords: Failure; Flap; Head; Neck; Reconstruction; Revision; Success.