Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5436.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55820-0.

The seed dispersal syndrome hypothesis in ungulate-dominated landscapes

Affiliations

The seed dispersal syndrome hypothesis in ungulate-dominated landscapes

Jose M Fedriani et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The Seed Dispersal Syndrome Hypothesis (SDSH) posits that fruit traits predict the main dispersers interacting with plant species. Mammalian dispersers, relying heavily on olfactory cues, are expected to select dull-colored, scented, and larger fruits compared to birds. However, challenges like overabundant seed predators and context-dependency of frugivore-plant interactions complicate SDSH expectations. We studied the Iberian pear, Pyrus bourgaeana, an expected mammal-dispersed tree based on its fruit traits. Extensive camera-trapping data (over 35,000 records) from several tree populations and years revealed visits from seven frugivore groups, with ungulate fruit predators (59-97%) and carnivore seed dispersers (1-20%) most frequent, while birds, lagomorphs, and rodents were infrequent (0-10%). Red deer and wild boar were also the main fruit removers in all sites and years but acted as fruit and seed predators, and thus likely exert conflicting selection pressures to those exerted by seed dispersers. Although, as predicted by the SDSH, most Iberian pear fruits were consumed by large and medium-sized mammals, the traits of Iberian pear fruits likely reflect selection pressures from dispersal vectors in past times. Our results do not challenge the SDHS but do reveal the importance of considering frugivore functional roles for its adequate evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of visits and number of visited Pyrus bourgaeana trees by the main four functional groups in the three study sites (Andujar, Matasgordas, Reserva) within southern Spain. The Andujar and Reserva populations were sampled during the fruiting seasons of 2019 and 2022, respectively. The Matasgordas populations was sampled during 2019, 2021 and 2022 fruiting seasons. The percent of handled fruits by the main frugivore functional groups in Andujar are also shown (A).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., & Galetti, M. (Eds.). Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation (CABI, 2002).
    1. Bascompte J, Jordano P. Mutualistic Networks. Princeton University Press; 2013.
    1. Fleming TH, Kress WJ. The Ornaments of Life: Coevolution and Conservation in the Tropics. University of Chicago Press; 2019.
    1. Corlett RT. Frugivory and seed dispersal. In: Del-Claro K, Torezan-Silingardi HM, editors. Plant-Animal Interactions. Cham: Springer; 2021.
    1. Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A. Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008;23(11):638–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.08.003. - DOI - PubMed