Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5406.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54932-x.

Comparison of surgical outcomes for hip fracture between older patients with and without cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Affiliations

Comparison of surgical outcomes for hip fracture between older patients with and without cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Chul-Ho Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Research on the treatment outcomes and mortality of patients with cancer and hip fractures remains limited. We aimed to assess the treatment outcomes and mortality in older patients with cancer and hip fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1264 patients aged ≥ 60 years treated for hip fractures between January 2005 and April 2022. The operation time, blood transfusion-related indicators, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, mortality rate, and clinical scores were compared. We also performed survival analysis. Subsequently, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed. In the unmatched cohort, we compared 273 patients with cancer and 991 controls. The cancer group exhibited a higher incidence of pneumonia (P = 0.025) and higher in-hospital and 1-year follow-up mortality rates (P = 0.044 and P < 0.001, respectively). In the matched cohort, the 1-year mortality rate remained higher in the cancer group (P < 0.001). The control group showed a higher survival rate in both unmatched and matched cohorts (P < 0.001 for both). The surgical outcomes for hip fractures were comparable between patients with and without cancer. We recommend surgical treatment for hip fractures in patients with cancer.

Keywords: Cancer; Complication; Hip fracture; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis between the cancer and control groups. (a) KM curve in the unmatched cohort and (b) K-M curve in the 1:1 propensity matched cohort.

References

    1. Edwards BJ, et al. Fractures frequently occur in older cancer patients: The MD Anderson cancer center experience. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26:1561–1568. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3962-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:7–307. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ryerson AB, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:1312–1337. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29936. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amarilla-Donoso FJ, et al. Quality of life in elderly people after a hip fracture: a prospective study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2020;18:71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01314-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh YK, Moon NH, Shin WC. Management of osteoporosis medication after osteoporotic fracture. Hip Pelvis. 2022;34:191–202. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.4.191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed