A sutureless overlapped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis
- PMID: 38443753
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.16880
A sutureless overlapped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis
Abstract
Aim: Creation of an overlapped anastomosis using handsewn sutures for common enterotomy is very popular in robotic right colectomy (RRC) with intracorpareal anastomosis (IA). The aim of this study is to present a simple method for constructing a sutureless overlapped anastomosis using a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material in RRC with IA.
Method: The distal ileum and proximal colon were put in overlapping positions. Enterotomies were created 2 cm proximal to the ileal stump and 8 cm distal to the colonic stump on the antimesenteric side. Subsequently, a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material was inserted into each lumen and fired. Finally, the bowel was elevated while holding the bioabsorbable material, and the common enterotomy was grasped with the robotic instrument in the middle and closed using a linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material.
Results: This technique was applied to 10 patients with tumours of the caecum, ascending colon, or transverse colon. The median operating time, anastomosis construction time, blood loss, and postoperative stay were 281 min (range 228-459 min), 12 min (range 11-17 min), 10 mL (range 0-110 mL), and 10 days (range 8-15 days), respectively. No adverse intraoperative events were observed. Postoperatively, one patient developed chylous ascites, but there were no other complications.
Conclusion: The simple technique for constructing a sutureless overlapped anastomosis using a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis appears to be safe and feasible.
Keywords: intracorporeal anastomosis; linear stapler; overlapped anastomosis; reinforced bioabsorbable material; robotic colectomy.
© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Similar articles
-
A comparative analysis of staple height used for robotic right colectomy.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 26;19(1):327. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02503-1. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40569493
-
A new overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material for intracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic colectomy.Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1427-1429. doi: 10.1111/codi.16247. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 35785465
-
Intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar: an anastomotic technique facilitating natural orifice specimen extraction in left-sided colorectal surgery.Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):766-771. doi: 10.1111/codi.16884. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38302860
-
Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02821-2. Epub 2023 May 15. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37184773
-
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27287905 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
External Lymphatic Fistula After Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Case Series.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;17(9):1416. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091416. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361343 Free PMC article.
-
Elevating surgical standards: The role of intraperitoneal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis in colon cancer surgery.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):106645. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106645. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40547143 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: first comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660
-
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short‐term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470‐2045(05)70221‐7
-
- Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five‐year follow‐up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7160
-
- Zhang H, Sun N, Fu Y, Zhao C. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJS Open. 2021;5:zrab133. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab133
-
- Nepal P, Mori S, Kita Y, Tanabe K, Baba K, Sasaki K, et al. Modified delta‐shaped anastomosis via the overlap method using linear staplers for colon cancer. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021;5:107–111. https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2020‐013
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources