The preferences of people in Australia to respond and engage with advertisements to promote reproductive health: Results of a discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 38444564
- PMCID: PMC10912617
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102657
The preferences of people in Australia to respond and engage with advertisements to promote reproductive health: Results of a discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Objectives: The health of people prior to pregnancy impacts pregnancy outcomes and childhood health, making the preconception period an important time to optimise health behaviours. Low awareness of the importance of this issue is a recognised barrier to achieving good preconception health. Public health messaging can help to address this barrier.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment to assess the preferences of people of reproductive age for a health promotion advertisement for preconception health was conducted. Attributes of the advertisement image, title, additional text content and positioning, and the location of advertisement were assessed by fitting a mixed logit model to the choices made.
Results: Three hundred and thirty-four responses were obtained, from people of reproductive age, both planning and not planning a pregnancy, in Australia. Participants placed most importance on the image, and the location in which they saw the advertisement. An image of adult and baby hands was preferred to adult hands only, and healthcare settings were preferred to more general media locations such as advertising online or on public transport. Preference was also given to the advertisement title of "Healthy you, Healthy baby", closely followed by "Are you ready for pregnancy?". The location and content of additional text did not significantly impact engagement with the advertisement.
Conclusion: The image and title on the advertisement, and the locations in which they are placed were the most significant features to impact engagement with a health promotion advertisement for preconception health. This can inform health promotion efforts for preconception health.
Keywords: Consumer preferences; Discrete choice experiment; Health communication; Health promotion; Preconception; Reproductive health.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Should Facebook advertisements promoting a physical activity smartphone app be image or video-based, and should they promote benefits of being active or the app attributes?Transl Behav Med. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2136-2143. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab101. Transl Behav Med. 2021. PMID: 34398963
-
Exploring Intended and Unintended Reactions to Healthy Weight and Lifestyle Advertisements: An Online Experiment.Health Educ Behav. 2023 Feb;50(1):58-69. doi: 10.1177/10901981221104727. Epub 2022 Jun 25. Health Educ Behav. 2023. PMID: 35758183
-
Acceptability of screening for pregnancy intention in general practice: a population survey of people of reproductive age.BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 20;21(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01110-3. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 32079524 Free PMC article.
-
Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Aug 10;23(4):1-398. eCollection 2023. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023. PMID: 37637488 Free PMC article.
-
Preconception knowledge, beliefs and behaviours among people of reproductive age: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Prev Med. 2023 Oct;175:107707. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107707. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Prev Med. 2023. PMID: 37730135 Review.
Cited by
-
What Does 'Preconception Health' Mean to People? A Public Consultation on Awareness and Use of Language.Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14181. doi: 10.1111/hex.14181. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39180340 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barros I.M., Alcântara T.S., Mesquita A.R., Santos A.C., Paixão F.P., Lyra D.P., Jr. The use of pictograms in the health care: a literature review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(5):704–719. - PubMed
-
- Bayly M, Cotter T, Carroll T. 14.4 Examining the effectiveness of public education campaigns. In: Scollo MM and Winstanley MH, editor. Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria. 2019.
-
- Bearak J., Popinchalk A., Ganatra B., Moller A.B., Tunçalp Ö., Beavin C., et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1152. e1161. - PubMed
-
- Black K.I., Dorney E. Australia The University of Sydney; Sydney: 2023. Preconception care in priority groups: optimisation and dissemination of an online preconception health selfassessment tool. National Women's Health Strategy & National Men's health strategy-health promotion - 4-EB5Q2RJ final report.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources