Randomized controlled trials in resuscitation
- PMID: 38444863
- PMCID: PMC10912727
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100582
Randomized controlled trials in resuscitation
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a gold standard in research and crucial to our understanding of resuscitation science. Many trials in resuscitation have had neutral findings, questioning which treatments are effective in cardiac resuscitation. While it is possible than many interventions do not improve patient outcomes, it is also possible that the large proportion of neutral findings are partially due to design limitations. RCTs can be challenging to implement, and require extensive resources, time, and funding. In addition, conducting RCTs in the out-of-hospital setting provides unique challenges that must be considered for a successful trial. This article will outline many important aspects of conducting trials in resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting including patient and outcome selection, trial design, and statistical analysis.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ian Drennan and Sheldon Cheskes are on the editorial board for Resuscitation.
References
-
- Kudenchuk Peter J., Brown Siobhan P., Mohamud D., et al. Amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. NEJM. 2016;374:1711–1722. - PubMed
-
- Graham N., Brian L., Henry W., et al. Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR. NEJM. 2015;373:2203–2214. - PubMed
-
- Perkins Gavin D., Chen J.i., Deakin Charles D., et al. A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. NEJM. 2018;379:711–721. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources