Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3151-3165.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001268.

The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in surgery

Affiliations

The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in surgery

Rasha Rashid et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: First released in 2017, the STROCSS guidelines have become integral for promoting high-quality reporting of observational research in surgery. However, regular updates are essential to ensure they remain relevant and of value to surgeons. Building on the 2021 updates, the authors have developed the STROCSS 2024 guidelines. This timely revision aims to address residual reporting gaps, assimilate recent advances, and further strengthen observational study quality across all surgical disciplines.

Methods: A core steering committee compiled proposed changes to update the STROCSS 2021 guidelines based on identified gaps in prior iterations. An expert panel of surgical research leaders then evaluated the proposed changes for inclusion. A Delphi consensus exercise was used. Proposals that scored between 7-9 on a nine-point Likert agreement scale, by ≥70% of Delphi participants, were integrated into the STROCSS 2024 checklist.

Results: In total, 46 of 56 invited participants (82%) completed the Delphi survey and hence participated in the development of STROCSS 2024. All suggested amendments met the criteria for inclusion, indicating a high level of agreement among the Delphi group. All proposed items were therefore integrated into the final revised checklist.

Conclusion: The authors present the updated STROCSS 2024 guidelines, which have been developed through expert consensus to further enhance the transparency and reporting quality of observational research in surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared. The authors have no financial, consultative, institutional, or any other relationships that might lead to bias or conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2234–2242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Barai I, Rajmohan S, et al. . Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2017;45:14–17. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Lee S, Jeong KJL, et al. . Reporting quality of observational studies in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 2016;76:585–589. - PubMed
    1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. . Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet (London, England) 2014;383:267–276. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Farwana R, Borrelli MR, et al. . Impact of the SCARE guideline on the reporting of surgical case reports: a before and after study. Int J Surg 2017;45:144–148. - PubMed