Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;32(5):762-784.
doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2322557. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges

Mohammad Hosseini  1   2 , Alex O Holcombe  3 , Marton Kovacs  4   5 , Hub Zwart  6 , Daniel S Katz  7   8   9   10 , Kristi Holmes  1   2
Affiliations

Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges

Mohammad Hosseini et al. Account Res. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Group authorship (also known as corporate authorship, team authorship, consortium authorship) refers to attribution practices that use the name of a collective (be it team, group, project, corporation, or consortium) in the authorship byline. Data shows that group authorships are on the rise but thus far, in scholarly discussions about authorship, they have not gained much specific attention. Group authorship can minimize tensions within the group about authorship order and the criteria used for inclusion/exclusion of individual authors. However, current use of group authorships has drawbacks, such as ethical challenges associated with the attribution of credit and responsibilities, legal challenges regarding how copyrights are handled, and technical challenges related to the lack of persistent identifiers (PIDs), such as ORCID, for groups. We offer two recommendations: 1) Journals should develop and share context-specific and unambiguous guidelines for group authorship, for which they can use the four baseline requirements offered in this paper; 2) Using persistent identifiers for groups and consistent reporting of members' contributions should be facilitated through devising PIDs for groups and linking these to the ORCIDs of their individual contributors and the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) of the published item.

Keywords: Authorship; ethics; group Processes; publishing; reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allen JB (1971). Friar As Critic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages (First Edition). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    1. Alliez P, Cosmo RD, Guedj B, Girault A, Hacid M-S, Legrand A, & Rougier N (2020). Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(01), 39–52. 10.1109/MCSE.2019.2949413 - DOI
    1. Andersen MZ, Fonnes S, Andresen K, & Rosenberg J (2020). Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 13(3), 199–205. 10.1111/jebm.12396 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett A, Garside D, Praag C. G. van, Hostler TJ, Garcia IK, Plomp E, Schettino A, Teplitzky S, & Ye H (2023). A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles. Journal of Trial & Error. 10.36850/mr8 - DOI
    1. Biagioli M, & Galison P (2003). Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. London: Psychology Press.

LinkOut - more resources