Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;31(3):324-330.
doi: 10.1177/15533506241238038. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology

Affiliations
Review

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology

Siwen Xie et al. Surg Innov. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is extensively utilized to treat a range of gynaecological conditions and pathologies. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery include the minimalization of blood loss and scarring, improved recovery times, and shorter hospital admissions. However, robotic technologies have had an increasing presence within gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in recent decades. This literature review therefore aims to discuss laparoscopy from 3 perspectives. First, the evolution of laparoscopy is reviewed with a focus on its origins, its transition from a diagnostic to an operative tool, and its role in present-day gynaecology. Second, interventions for benign gynaecological conditions (including excision of benign ovarian tumours, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and laparoscopic myomectomy) are reviewed. The laparoscopic management of malignant gynaecology (including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer) is also discussed. Finally, whilst robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is experiencing rapid technological advancement, it is pertinent to consider the extent of its benefits when compared to open or conventional laparoscopic approaches in gynaecological surgery.

Keywords: artificial intelligence in surgery; gynecologic laparoscopy; robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raakow J, Klein D, Barutcu AG, Biebl M, Pratschke J, Raakow R. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery comparing long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(12):5533. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-07351-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hargest R. Five thousand years of minimal access surgery: 1850 to 1990: technological developments. JRSM. 2020;114(1):19-29. doi:10.1177/0141076820967918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):903. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen RX, Su ZY, Yang LL, Xin LP, Yuan XD, Wang YL. The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):9. doi:10.1186/s12893-020-00703-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yi XJ, Chen SL, Wang W, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor (NDACPT) in the pancreatic body and tail. Surg Laparosc Endosc Pct Tech. 2017;27(4):206. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000416. - DOI - PubMed