Demographics and Career Trends of Urology Fellowship Directors in the United States

Abstract

Introduction: Fellowship directors (FDs) hold significant leadership roles within the academic urology community. We sought to characterize common trends in training and academic productivity among urology FDs. Moreover, we aimed to characterize gender differences across subspecialties to better inform gender-based inclusion efforts and contemporary leadership pathways.

Methods: FDs were studied across 6 urologic subspecialties. Society and institutional websites were queried for demographics, education/training institutions, timelines of career milestones, and academic productivity. χ², Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests and Kendall tau rank correlation were employed with an alpha cutoff of .05.

Results: There were 219 FDs included, representing 208 fellowship programs at 93 institutions. FDs were 176 (80%) males and 43 (20%) females. There was a significant association between gender and subspecialty. The median age for all FDs was 52 years old. Significant differences in age were demonstrated across subspecialties. For all FDs, females were younger than males, at 49 and 53 years, respectively (P = .001). The median H-index for all FDs was 23.5. H-index was significantly different between genders and subspecialities. There was a strong, positive correlation between age vs H-index for all FDs. Half of FDs had completed fellowship training at one of 14 institutions.

Conclusions: We describe the landscape of leadership in urology subspecialty training. There are an increasing number of female FDs. Composition of leadership varies by subspecialty; however, the careers of all current urology FDs are marked by lifelong achievements in academic productivity. Moreover, a small group of institutions produce a substantial number of FDs.

Keywords: diversity; education; gender equality; leadership.