Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure
- PMID: 38448040
- PMCID: PMC10916172
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002295
Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure
Abstract
Background: In general, the quality of pain care in emergency departments (ED) is poor, despite up to 80% of all ED patients presenting with pain. This may be due to the lack of well-validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain care in the ED setting. The American Pain Society-Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Edition (APS-POQ-R), with slight modification for ED patients, is a potentially useful PROM for the adult ED, however it is yet to be completely validated.
Methods: Adult patients, who had presented with moderate to severe acute pain, were recruited at two large inner-city EDs in Australia. A modified version of the APS-POQ-R was administered at the completion of their ED care. Responses were randomly split into three groups and underwent multiple rounds of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with testing for construct, convergent, divergent validity and internal consistency.
Results: A total of 646 ED patients (55.6% female), with a median age of 48.3 years, and moderate to severe pain on arrival, completed the ED-modified APS-POQ-R. Psychometric evaluation resulted in a reduced nine-question tool, which measures three constructs (pain relief and satisfaction (α=0.891), affective distress (α=0.823) and pain interference (α=0.908)) and demonstrated construct, convergent, divergent validity, and internal consistency.
Conclusions: This new tool, which we refer to as the American Pain Society-Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised for the ED (APS-POQ-RED), should form the basis for reporting patient-reported outcomes of ED pain care in future quality improvement and research.
Keywords: Emergency department; Pain; Quality measurement.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106. Scand J Pain. 2019. PMID: 30352045
-
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19. J Pain. 2015. PMID: 25998207
-
Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021. PMID: 33451283 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Reported outcomes of pain care research in the adult emergency department: A scoping review.Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Jun;24(2):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Australas Emerg Care. 2021. PMID: 33187935
-
The relationship between time to analgesic administration and emergency department length of stay: A retrospective review.J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jan;76(1):183-190. doi: 10.1111/jan.14216. Epub 2019 Oct 9. J Adv Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31566800 Review.
References
-
- Hughes JA, Douglas C, Jones L, et al. . Identifying patients presenting in pain to the adult emergency department: a binary classification task and description of prevalence. Int Emerg Nurs 2023;68:101272. 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101272 - DOI
-
- Taylor D, Lee M, Johnson OG, et al. . Patient satisfaction with their pain management: the effect of provision of pain management advice. Emerg Med Australas 2016;28:8–9.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous