Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;36(3).
doi: 10.1002/chir.23652.

Enantiomeric purity of synthetic therapeutic peptides: A review

Affiliations
Review

Enantiomeric purity of synthetic therapeutic peptides: A review

Devendra Badgujar et al. Chirality. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Synthetic therapeutic peptides are a complex and popular class of pharmaceuticals. In recent years, peptides with proven therapeutic activity have gained significant interest in the market. The determination of synthetic peptide enantiomeric purity plays a critical role in the evaluation of the quality of the medicine. Since racemization is one of the most common side reactions occurring in AAs or peptides, enantiomeric impurities such as D-isomers can form during the peptide synthesis or can be introduced from the starting materials (e.g., AAs). The therapeutic effect of a synthetic or semi-synthetic bioactive peptide molecule depends on its AA enantiomeric purity and secondary/tertiary structure. Therefore, the enantiomeric purity determination for synthetic peptides is supportive for interpreting unwanted therapeutic effects and determining the quality of synthetic peptide therapeutics. However, enantiomeric purity analysis encounters formidable analytical challenges during chromatographic separation, as D/L isomers have identical physical-chemical properties except stereochemical configuration. To ensure peptides AA stereochemical configuration whether in the free or bound state, sensitive and reproducible quantitative analytical method is mandatory. In this regard, numerous analytical techniques were emerged for the quantification of D-isomeric impurities in synthetic peptides, but still, very few reports are available in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the importance, regulatory requirements, and various analytical methods used for peptide enantiomeric purity determination. In addition, we discussed the available literature in terms of enantiomeric impurity detection, common hydrolysis procedural aspects, and different analytical strategies used for sample preparation.

Keywords: amino acids; chiral chromatography; deuterium labeling method; gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy; synthetic peptide drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. D'Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, et al. Related impurities in peptide medicines. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;101:2-30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). ANDAs for certain highly purified synthetic peptide drug products that refer to listed drugs of rDNA origin, guidance for industry. 2017.
    1. Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(1):122-128. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003
    1. Wang L, Wang N, Zhang W, et al. Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions. Signal Trans Targeted Ther. 2022;7(1):48. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4
    1. Riester D, Wiesmüller K-H, Stoll D, Kuhn RJ. Racemization of amino acids in solid-phase peptide synthesis investigated by capillary electrophoresis. Anal Chem. 1996;68(14):2361-2365. doi:10.1021/ac9511511

LinkOut - more resources