Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 7;25(1):112.
doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02730-4.

Differences of respiratory mechanics in mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome between patients with COVID-19 and Influenza A

Affiliations

Differences of respiratory mechanics in mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome between patients with COVID-19 and Influenza A

Eunki Chung et al. Respir Res. .

Abstract

Background: Whether COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) should be approached differently in terms of mechanical ventilation therapy compared to other virus-induced ARDS is debatable. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain whether the respiratory mechanical characteristics of COVID-19-induced ARDS differ from those of influenza A induced ARDS, in order to establish a rationale for mechanical ventilation therapy in COVID-19-induced ARDS.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS and influenza A induced ARDS. We included intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 or Influenza A aged ≥ 19, who were diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin definition between January 2015 and July 2021. Ventilation parameters for respiratory mechanics were collected at specific times on days one, three, and seven after intubation.

Results: The median age of the 87 participants was 71.0 (62.0-78.0) years old, and 63.2% were male. The ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to the fractional of inspiratory oxygen concentration in COVID-19-induced ARDS was lower than that in influenza A induced ARDS during the initial stages of mechanical ventilation (influenza A induced ARDS 216.1 vs. COVID-19-induced ARDS 167.9, p = 0.009, day 1). The positive end expiratory pressure remained consistently higher in the COVID-19 group throughout the follow-up period (7.0 vs. 10.0, p < 0.001, day 1). COVID-19 and influenza A initially showed different directions for peak inspiratory pressure and dynamic compliance; however, after day 3, both groups exhibited similar directions. Dynamic driving pressure exhibited opposite trends between the two groups during mechanical ventilation.

Conclusions: Respiratory mechanics show clear differences between COVID-19-induced ARDS and influenza A induced ARDS. Based on these findings, we can consider future treatment strategies for COVID-19-induced ARDS.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Influenza A; Mechanical ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes in respiratory mechanics between COVID-19-induced ARDS and influenza A induced ARDS. Median values of each parameter, including PIP (A), P/F ratio (B), Cdyn (C), and DP (D), are displayed according to the number of days after intubation. PIP, peak inspiratory pressure; P/F ratio, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) divided by inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2); Cdyn, dynamic compliance; DP, dynamic driving pressure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in respiratory mechanics between COVID-19-induced ARDS and influenza A induced ARDS survivors. Median values of each parameter, including PIP (A), P/F ratio (B), Cdyn (C), and DP (D), are displayed according to the number of days after intubation. PIP, peak inspiratory pressure; P/F ratio, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) divided by inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2); Cdyn, dynamic compliance; DP, dynamic driving pressure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33. - PubMed
    1. Meyer NJ, Gattinoni L, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2021;398:622–37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macedo A, Goncalves N, Febra C. COVID-19 fatality rates in hospitalized patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2021;57:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.02.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasan SS, Capstick T, Ahmed R, Kow CS, Mazhar F, Merchant HA, Zaidi STR. Mortality in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and corticosteroids use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020;14:1149–63. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1804365. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hariri LP, North CM, Shih AR, Israel RA, Maley JH, Villalba JA, Vinarsky V, Rubin J, Okin DA, Sclafani A, et al. Lung histopathology in Coronavirus Disease 2019 as compared with severe Acute Respiratory Sydrome and H1N1 Influenza: a systematic review. Chest. 2021;159:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.259. - DOI - PMC - PubMed