Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 16;2024(2):hoae010.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae010. eCollection 2024.

A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey

Affiliations

A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey

Kathleen Duffin et al. Hum Reprod Open. .

Abstract

Study question: Twenty years after the inception of the first fertility preservation programme for pre-pubertal boys, what are the current international practices with regard to cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue?

Summary answer: Worldwide, testicular tissue has been cryopreserved from over 3000 boys under the age of 18 years for a variety of malignant and non-malignant indications; there is variability in practices related to eligibility, clinical assessment, storage, and funding.

What is known already: For male patients receiving gonadotoxic treatment prior to puberty, testicular tissue cryopreservation may provide a method of fertility preservation. While this technique remains experimental, an increasing number of centres worldwide are cryopreserving immature testicular tissue and are approaching clinical application of methods to use this stored tissue to restore fertility. As such, standards for quality assurance and clinical care in preserving immature testicular tissue should be established.

Study design size duration: A detailed survey was sent to 17 centres within the recently established ORCHID-NET consortium, which offer testicular tissue cryopreservation to patients under the age of 18 years. The study encompassed 60 questions and remained open from 1 July to 1 November 2022.

Participants/materials setting methods: Of the 17 invited centres, 16 completed the survey, with representation from Europe, Australia, and the USA. Collectively, these centres have cryopreserved testicular tissue from patients under the age of 18 years. Data are presented using descriptive analysis.

Main results and the role of chance: Since the establishment of the first formal fertility preservation programme for pre-pubertal males in 2002, these 16 centres have cryopreserved tissue from 3118 patients under the age of 18 years, with both malignant (60.4%) and non-malignant (39.6%) diagnoses. All centres perform unilateral biopsies, while 6/16 sometimes perform bilateral biopsies. When cryopreserving tissue, 9/16 centres preserve fragments sized ≤5 mm3 with the remainder preserving fragments sized 6-20 mm3. Dimethylsulphoxide is commonly used as a cryoprotectant, with medium supplements varying across centres. There are variations in funding source, storage duration, and follow-up practice. Research, with consent, is conducted on stored tissue in 13/16 centres.

Limitations reasons for caution: While this is a multi-national study, it will not encompass every centre worldwide that is cryopreserving testicular tissue from males under 18 years of age. As such, it is likely that the actual number of patients is even higher than we report. Whilst the study is likely to reflect global practice overall, it will not provide a complete picture of practices in every centre.

Wider implications of the findings: Given the research advances, it is reasonable to suggest that cryopreserved immature testicular tissue will in the future be used clinically to restore fertility. The growing number of patients undergoing this procedure necessitates collaboration between centres to better harmonize clinical and research protocols evaluating tissue function and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Study funding/competing interests: K.D. is supported by a CRUK grant (C157/A25193). R.T.M. is supported by an UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/S017151/1). The MRC Centre for Reproductive Health at the University of Edinburgh is supported by MRC (MR/N022556/1). C.L.M. is funded by Kika86 and ZonMW TAS 116003002. A.M.M.v.P. is supported by ZonMW TAS 116003002. E.G. was supported by the Research Program of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G.0109.18N), Kom op tegen Kanker, the Strategic Research Program (VUB_SRP89), and the Scientific Fund Willy Gepts. J.-B.S. is supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (TJ2020-0026). The work of NORDFERTIL is supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (PR2019-0123; PR2022-0115), the Swedish Research Council (2018-03094; 2021-02107), and the Birgitta and Carl-Axel Rydbeck's Research Grant for Paediatric Research (2020-00348; 2021-00073; 2022-00317; 2023-00353). C.E is supported by the Health Department of the Basque Government (Grants 2019111068 and 2022111067) and Inocente Inocente Foundation (FII22/001). M.P.R. is funded by a Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health Grant No: MR/N022556/1. A.F. and N.R. received support from a French national research grant PHRC No. 2008/071/HP obtained by the French Institute of Cancer and the French Healthcare Organization. K.E.O. is funded by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the US National Institutes of Health HD100197. V.B-L is supported by the French National Institute of Cancer (Grant Seq21-026). Y.J. is supported by the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation and a Medical Research Future Fund MRFAR000308. E.G., N.N., S.S., C.L.M., A.M.M.v.P., C.E., R.T.M., K.D., M.P.R. are members of COST Action CA20119 (ANDRONET) supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The Danish Child Cancer Foundation is also thanked for financial support (C.Y.A.). The authors declare no competing interests.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Keywords: chemotherapy; childhood cancer; children; cryopreservation; fertility preservation; male; oncofertility; spermatogonia; testicular sperm extraction; testicular tissue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Details of 3118 male patients who have had testicular tissue cryopreserved. (A) Patients stratified by age group. (B) Number of patients per year. Of note, 14/16 survey responses were completed in July or August 2022; therefore, this does not represent all patients presenting in 2022. (C) Breakdown of diagnoses of patients undergoing testicular tissue cryopreservation. CNS: central nervous system; DSD: disorder of sex development.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Transport of biopsied testicular material. (A) After the biopsy procedure, tissue is transported for processing and cryopreservation within and between centres and countries. (B) Media used for transport of biopsied tissue. HBSS: Hank’s balanced salt solution; HEPES HTF: N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulphonic acid-buffered human tubal fluid.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Handling of tissue at cryopreservation centre. (A) Size of testicular fragment (mm3) prepared for cryopreservation. (B) Cryoprotectants used. (C) Additional media constituents. All centres add additional constituents to media for cryopreservation. DMSO: dimethylsulphoxide; NEAA: non-essential amino acids.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Analysis of testicular tissues prior to and following cryopreservation and thawing. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses conducted on testicular tissues to assess quality.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Sources of funding and duration of tissue storage offered by centre. (A) Sources of funding for testicular tissue cryopreservation. (B) Maximum number of years for which testicular tissue can be stored.

References

    1. Ahler A, Gook D, Moussaoui D, Archer J, Zacharin M, D’Arcy CE, Sullivan M, Jayasinghe Y.. Metastatic neuroblastoma in fertility preservation biopsy of clinically normal testis: a case report. Reprod Biomed Online 2023;47:103232. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RA, Wallace WHB, Telfer EE.. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: clinical and research perspectives. Hum Reprod Open 2017;2017:hox001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benninghoven-Frey KM, Neuhaus N, Lahtinen AK, Krallmann C, Portela JMD, Jarisch A, Nordhoff V, Soave A, Ba Omar HAM, Sundin M. et al. Early testicular maturation is sensitive to depletion of spermatogonial pool in sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2022;107:975–979. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittinger SE, Nazaretian SP, Gook DA, Parmar C, Harrup RA, Stern CJ.. Detection of Hodgkin lymphoma within ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril [Internet] 2011;95:803.e3–803–e6. - PubMed
    1. Braye A, Tournaye H, Goossens E.. Setting up a cryopreservation programme for immature testicular tissue: lessons learned after more than 15 years of experience. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019;13:1179558119886342. - PMC - PubMed