Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 21:129.
doi: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10537. eCollection 2024.

Recent advances in rectal cancer treatment - are we on the right track?

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in rectal cancer treatment - are we on the right track?

Bengt Glimelius. Ups J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Staging and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved over several decades with considerably fewer locoregional recurrences but no marked improved survival since systemic recurrence risks remain virtually unchanged. This development will briefly be summarised followed by a thorough discussion of two recent developments.

Methods: A systematic approach towards the literature is aimed at focusing on organ preservation and the delivery of all non-surgical treatments prior to surgery or total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT).

Results: Organ preservation, that is to defer surgery if the tumour happens to disappear completely after any pre-treatment given to locally advanced tumours to decrease recurrence risks has increased in popularity and is, if not universally, widely accepted. To give neo-adjuvant treatment to intentionally obtain a clinically complete remission to avoid surgery is practised in some environments but is mostly still experimental. TNT, that is to provide both radiotherapy and chemotherapy aimed at killing microscopic disease in the pelvis or elsewhere has been subject to several trials. Collectively, they show that the chance of achieving a complete response, pathologically or clinically, has approximately doubled, increasing the chance for organ preservation, and the risk of distant metastasis has decreased at least in some trials. The best schedule remains to be established.

Conclusions: To obtain substantial progress and also improve survival, the systemic treatments need to be improved even if preoperative delivery is more effective and better tolerated than postoperative. The locoregional treatment may be further optimised through better risk prediction.

Keywords: Locally advanced rectal cancer; organ preservation; total neoadjuvant treatment; watch and wait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progress in rectal cancer treatment during recent decades. Figure 1. Randomised trials of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) prior to surgery having improved outcome are shown in the right column by year of the main publication. In the left column, important diagnostic and surgical improvements are shown by the year of the most relevant, not necessarily the first publication. TME, total mesorectal excision, APE abdomino-perineal excision, CRT, chemoradiotherapy using a fluoropyrimidine, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, CRM, circumferential resection margin, MRF, mesorectal fascia, scRT, short-course radiotherapy (5 Gy × 5), lcRT, long-course radiotherapy (1.8–2Gy × 25–28), LRR, locoregional recurrence. DFS, disease-free survival, DrTF, disease-related treatment failure, TNT, total neoadjuvant treatment, W&W, watch and wait. This review focuses on the latter two developments, W&W and TNT.

References

    1. Aschele C, Glynne-Jones R. Selecting a TNT schedule in locally advanced rectal cancer: can we predict who actually benefits? Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:2567. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092567 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennecke HF, Bahnson HT, Lin B, O’Rourke C, Kaplan J, Pham H, et al. Patterns of practice and improvements in survival among patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer treated with trimodality therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1466–70. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2831 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Storli PE, Dille-Amdam RG, Skjaerseth GH, Gran MV, Myklebust TA, Gronbech JE, et al. Cumulative incidence of first recurrence after curative treatment of stage I-III colorectal cancer. Competing risk analyses of temporal and anatomic patterns. Acta Oncol. 2023;62:1822–30. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2269644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waldenstedt S, Haglind E, Angenete E. Symptoms and diagnosis of local recurrence after rectal cancer treatment. Acta Oncol. 2022;61:1043–9. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2106794 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glimelius B. Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: development during the past decades and plans for the future. Ups J Med Sci. 2012;117:225–36. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.658974 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources