Robot-Assisted Urological Oncology Procedures, Outcomes, and Safety in Frail Patients: A Narrative Review of Available Studies
- PMID: 38451128
- PMCID: PMC11059976
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2024.23198
Robot-Assisted Urological Oncology Procedures, Outcomes, and Safety in Frail Patients: A Narrative Review of Available Studies
Abstract
In this study, we assess the impact of frailty on the success rate and risk of complications of robot-assisted urological procedures and introduce effective preoperative screening tools to evaluate frail patients' fitness to tolerate robot-assisted urological surgery. We performed a search of electronic databases for available studies, published up to August 2023, investigating the outcomes of robot-assisted urological oncology procedures and their safety in frail patients. Sixteen studies were ultimately selected, investigating the implications of frailty in robot-assisted radical cystectomy, robotassisted partial nephrectomy, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. All the studies used the Clavien-Dindo classification of complications with serious complications considered as Clavien-Dindo 3. Frail patients significantly benefit from robot-assisted urological procedures in comparison to open surgery, with lower rates of blood transfusion and a shorter length of stay. However, they also have a higher risk of postoperative complications than non-frail patients, as well as increased rates of conversion to open, total hospital costs, and in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted procedures. Robot-assisted urological procedures can improve the postoperative recovery of frail patients in comparison to open surgery. Reliable frailty indexes such as the Johns Hopkins indicator and simplified frailty index, as well as the Geriatric 8 screening tool, should be routinely used in the preoperative assessment of frail patients to optimize surgical decision-making.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Frailty impact on postoperative complications and early mortality rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review.Arab J Urol. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1841538. Arab J Urol. 2020. PMID: 33763244 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differences in short-term outcomes between open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in frail malnourished patients.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1347-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.204. Epub 2020 Mar 14. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32220544
-
Partial nephrectomy in frail patients: Benefits of robot-assisted surgery.Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101588. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101588. Epub 2021 Apr 22. Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33945961
-
Prevalence of frailty syndrome in urological patients undergoing major elective surgical procedure due to malignancy.Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(1):52-58. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0021. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Cent European J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35591961 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):760-774. doi: 10.1111/iju.14005. Epub 2019 May 13. Int J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31083783 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Elderly Patients.Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1857. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111857. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40507338 Free PMC article.
-
Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Definitive Therapies: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5561. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185561. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39337047 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Rosiello G, Larcher A, Fallara G, et al. A comprehensive assessment of frailty status on surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy-A large, retrospective, single-center study. Urol Oncol. 2023;41(3):149.e17 149.e25. (10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.008) - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources