Safety and effectiveness of the three-dimensional-printed guide plate-assisted rotation axis positioning of a hinged external fixator for the elbow
- PMID: 38451310
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06134-3
Safety and effectiveness of the three-dimensional-printed guide plate-assisted rotation axis positioning of a hinged external fixator for the elbow
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plates for assisting in the positioning of the rotation axis of an elbow-hinged external fixator.
Methods: Terrible triad (TT) patients, who were screened using the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, underwent installation of a hinged external fixator on the basis of internal fixation; 3D-printed guide plates, generated from the patient's imaging data, assisted in positioning the rotation axis. All patients received the same peri-operative management and were followed up at six, 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperatively. The duration of positioning pin placement, the number of fluoroscopies, pin placement success rate, types and incidence of post-operative complications, and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) of the diseased elbow and range of motion (ROM) of both elbows were assessed.
Results: In 25 patients who completed the follow-up, the average time required for positioning pin placement was 329.32 ± 42.38 s (263-443 s), the average number of fluoroscopies was 2.32 ± 0.48 times (2-3 times), and the pin placement success rate was 100%. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPS of the diseased elbow was 97.50 ± 6.92 (75-100), with an excellent and good rate of 100%, and all patients demonstrated stable concentric reduction. The average range of flexion and extension was 135.08° ± 17.10° (77-146°), while the average range of rotation was 169.21° ± 18.14° (108-180°). No significant difference was observed in the average ROM between the both elbows (P > 0.05). Eight (32%) patients developed post-operative complications, including elbow stiffness due to heterotopic ossification in three (12%) patients, all of whom did not require secondary intervention.
Conclusion: Utilizing 3D-printed guide plates for positioning the rotation axis of an elbow-hinged external fixator significantly reduced intra-operative positioning pin placement time and the number of fluoroscopies with excellent positioning results. Satisfactory results were also obtained in terms of post-operative complications, elbow ROM, and functional scores.
Keywords: Elbow injuries; External fixators; Printing; Prognosis; Rotation axis; Three-dimensional.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
References
-
- Bauer AS, Lawson BK, Bliss RL et al (2012) Risk factors for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification of the elbow: case-control study. J Hand Surg Am 37(7):1422–9.e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey M (2017) Complex elbow instability: surgical management of elbow fracture dislocations. EFORT Open Rev 1(5):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000036 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen HW, Liu GD, Wu LJ (2014) Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review. PLoS One 9(5):e97476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097476 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- He X, Fen Q, Yang J et al (2021) Risk factors of elbow stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of the terrible triad of the elbow joint. Orthop Surg 13(2):530–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12879 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chen NC, Julka A (2010) Hinged external fixation of the elbow. Hand Clin 26(3):423–433, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2010.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
