Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 7;4(3):e0002959.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002959. eCollection 2024.

Towards a Feminist Global Health Policy: Power, intersectionality, and transformation

Hannah Eger  1   2 , Shubha Chacko  3 , Salma El-Gamal  4 , Thomas Gerlinger  1 , Alexandra Kaasch  2 , Marie Meudec  5 , Shehnaz Munshi  6   7 , Awa Naghipour  8 , Emma Rhule  9 , Yatirajula Kanaka Sandhya  10 , Oriana López Uribe  11   12
Affiliations

Towards a Feminist Global Health Policy: Power, intersectionality, and transformation

Hannah Eger et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

In the realm of global health policy, the intricacies of power dynamics and intersectionality have become increasingly evident. Structurally embedded power hierarchies constitute a significant concern in achieving health for all and demand transformational change. Adopting intersectional feminist approaches potentially mitigates health inequities through more inclusive and responsive health policies. While feminist approaches to foreign and development policies are receiving increasing attention, they are not accorded the importance they deserve in global health policy. This article presents a framework for a Feminist Global Health Policy (FGHP), outlines the objectives and underlying principles and identifies the actors responsible for its meaningful implementation. Recognising that power hierarchies and societal contexts inherently shape research, the proposed framework was developed via a participatory research approach that aligns with feminist principles. Three independent online focus groups were conducted between August and September 2022 with 11 participants affiliated to the global-academic or local-activist level and covering all WHO regions. The qualitative content analysis revealed that a FGHP must be centred on considerations of intersectionality, power and knowledge paradigms to present meaningful alternatives to the current structures. By balancing guiding principles with sensitivity for context-specific adaptations, the framework is designed to be applicable locally and globally, whilst its adoption is intended to advance health equity and reproductive justice, with communities and policymakers identified as the main actors. This study underscores the importance of dismantling power structures by fostering intersectional and participatory approaches for a more equitable global health landscape. The FGHP framework is intended to initiate debate among global health practitioners, policymakers, researchers and communities. Whilst an undeniably intricate and time-consuming process, continuous and collaborative work towards health equity is imperative to translate this vision into practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Data analysis process.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Visualisation of the code system with thematic main and sub codes.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Synthesis of a feminist global health policy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Seventieth session Agenda items 15 and 116, A/RES/70/1. 2015.
    1. Yao Q, Li X, Luo F, Yang L, Liu C, Sun J. The historical roots and seminal research on health equity: a referenced publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:152. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1058-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M, et al.. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. The Lancet. 2019;393:2440–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braveman P. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:167–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva; 2010.

LinkOut - more resources