Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: The Effect of Risk Factors at Presentation on Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Purpose: Analyze the influence of risk factors at presentation in the long-term immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) outcomes of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP).

Design: Retrospective multicenter study.

Participants: Patients with OMMP seen at the Duke Eye Center, Tecnologico de Monterrey, and Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 1990 to 2022.

Methods: Data at presentation on demographics, direct immunofluorescence, ocular findings, sites of extraocular manifestations (EOMs), and previous treatments in patients with a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of OMMP, were analyzed with multivariable analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes.

Main outcome measures: (1) Inflammatory control (no conjunctival inflammation in both eyes at 3 months on IMT); (2) relapse (new-onset inflammation after absolute control in either eye); (3) progression (≥ 1 cicatrizing stage progression in either eye); and (4) vision loss (≥ 2 Snellen lines).

Results: A total of 117 patients (234 eyes), 61% (71/117) of whom were women, with a mean age of 66.6 (SD: 12.4) years (range: 37-97 years) and median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range: 16-66 months; range: 3-265 months), were enrolled. Inflammatory control was achieved in 57% of patients (67/117), with high-risk EOM (HR-EOM), including esophageal, nasopharyngeal, and/or genital involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 12.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-59.99; P = 0.002) and corneal scarring (aOR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15-8.14; P = 0.025), as significant risk factors for persistent inflammation. Disease relapse, progression, and vision loss occurred in 20% of patients (23/117), 12% of patients (14/117), and 27% of patients (32/117), respectively. Baseline corneal scarring was a risk factor for relapse (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.61-10.62; P = 0.003), progression (aOR: 11.46; 95% CI: 1.78-73.75; P = 0.010), and vision loss (aOR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.35-9.10; P = 0.010). HR-EOM was associated with stage progression (aOR, 34.57; 95% CI, 6.57-181.89; P<0.001) and vision loss (aOR, 8.42; 95% CI, 2.50-28.42; P = 0.001). No significant differences were found between IMT regimes and relapse (P = 0.169).

Conclusions: Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid presenting with HR-EOMs and corneal scarring has an increased risk of stage progression and vision loss. Corneal scarring and severe inflammation at baseline were associated with an increased risk of relapse. A disease progression staging system incorporating both the HR-EOMs and corneal involvement is required to predict the visual outcome of OMMP better.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Keywords: Cicatrizing conjunctivitis; Corneal scarring; Immunosuppressive therapy; Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid.