Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 7;12(2):e003905.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003905.

External validation and application of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT) for prediction of type 2 diabetes onset in the US population

Affiliations

External validation and application of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT) for prediction of type 2 diabetes onset in the US population

Kathy Kornas et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: Characterizing diabetes risk in the population is important for population health assessment and diabetes prevention planning. We aimed to externally validate an existing 10-year population risk model for type 2 diabetes in the USA and model the population benefit of diabetes prevention approaches using population survey data.

Research design and methods: The Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT), originally derived and validated in Canada, was applied to an external validation cohort of 23 477 adults from the 2009 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We assessed predictive performance for discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration plots against observed incident diabetes cases identified from the NHIS 2009-2018 cycles. We applied DPoRT to the 2018 NHIS cohort (n=21 187) to generate 10-year risk prediction estimates and characterize the preventive benefit of three diabetes prevention scenarios: (1) community-wide strategy; (2) high-risk strategy and (3) combined approach.

Results: DPoRT demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistic=0.778 (males); 0.787 (females)) and good calibration across the range of risk. We predicted a baseline risk of 10.2% and 21 076 000 new cases of diabetes in the USA from 2018 to 2028. The community-wide strategy and high-risk strategy estimated diabetes risk reductions of 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively. The combined approach estimated a 0.4% risk reduction and 843 000 diabetes cases averted in 10 years.

Conclusions: DPoRT has transportability for predicting population-level diabetes risk in the USA using routinely collected survey data. We demonstrate the model's applicability for population health assessment and diabetes prevention planning. Our modeling predicted that the combination of community-wide and targeted prevention approaches for those at highest risk are needed to reduce diabetes burden in the USA.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, type 2; population health; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT) predictive performance for the original and updated models in the US population: (A) DPoRT original (male); (B) DPoRT original (female); (C) intercept recalibration (male); (D) intercept recalibration (female); (E) logistic recalibration (male); (F) logistic recalibration (female); (G) model extension (insurance) (male); (H) model extension (insurance) (female); (I) model extension (ethnicity) (male); (J) model extension (ethnicity) (female).
Figure 2
Figure 2
10-Year Diabetes Population Risk Tool estimated diabetes risk and new cases (2018–2028) in the US population according to: (A) age group; (B) ethnicity; (C) body mass index (BMI).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted diabetes risk and cases in the US population at baseline and by prevention scenario (2018–2028).

Similar articles

References

    1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. . IDF diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271–81. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou B. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016;387:1513–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang L, Li X, Wang Z, et al. . Trends in prevalence of diabetes and control of risk factors in diabetes among US adults, 1999-2018. JAMA 2021;326:1–13. 10.1001/jama.2021.9883 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Ren Z-H, Qiang H, et al. . Trends in the incidence of diabetes mellitus: results from the global burden of disease study 2017 and implications for diabetes mellitus prevention. BMC Public Health 2020;20:.:1415. 10.1186/s12889-020-09502-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konchak JN, Moran MR, O’Brien MJ, et al. . The state of diabetes prevention policy in the USA following the affordable care act. Curr Diab Rep 2016;16:1–12.:55. 10.1007/s11892-016-0742-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types