Cardiogenic Shock Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality (ANZACS-QI 73)
- PMID: 38453606
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.009
Cardiogenic Shock Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality (ANZACS-QI 73)
Abstract
Background & aims: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with significant mortality. We describe a contemporary, real-world cohort of patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and CS, including 30-day mortality and clinically relevant predictors of mortality.
Methods: All patients presenting with STEMI who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in New Zealand (2016 to 2020) were identified from the Aotearoa New Zealand All Cardiology Services Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) registry and stratified based on their Killip class on arrival to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality prior to PCI and to develop a mortality scoring system.
Results: In total, 6,649 patients were identified, including 192 (2.9%) Killip IV (CS) patients. Thirty-day mortality was 47.5% in patients with CS, 14.6% in those with heart failure without shock, and 3% in those without heart failure. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality for patients with CS were: estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 (relative risk [RR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-2.58), cardiac arrest (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.06), diabetes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.70), female sex (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72), femoral arterial access (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.90) and left main stem culprit (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.65-2.84). A multivariable Shock score was developed which predicts 30-day mortality with good global discrimination (area under the curve 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85).
Conclusion: In this national cohort, the 30-day mortality for STEMI patients presenting with CS treated with PCI remains high, at nearly 50%. The ANZACS-QI Shock score is a promising tool for mortality risk stratification prior to PCI but requires further validation.
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Mortality risk tool; Percutaneous coronary intervention; ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Copyright © 2024 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Electrocardiographic patterns and clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - A propensity score analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Aug;65:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.022. Epub 2024 Mar 4. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38448259
-
Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/2048872617706503. Epub 2017 Apr 28. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018. PMID: 28452562
-
Impact of prior revascularization on the outcomes of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 30344055
-
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29146672 Review.
-
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Sep 5;8(6):640-650. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac018. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022. PMID: 35460230 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2024 Jun 6;28(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38845019 Free PMC article.
-
AI-Based Predictive Models for Cardiogenic Shock in STEMI: Real-World Data for Early Risk Assessment and Prognostic Insights.J Clin Med. 2025 May 25;14(11):3698. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113698. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40507459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous