Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;57(6):329-333.
doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.22151.

Closed versus medial open reduction in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip under age 1: A retrospective comparative study

Affiliations

Closed versus medial open reduction in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip under age 1: A retrospective comparative study

Sancar Bakircioğlu et al. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the mid-term results of closed reduction (CR) versus medial open reduction (MOR) in the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) under age 1.

Methods: Thirty-four patients with DDH (41 hips) were included in this retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 2-6.9 years). All hips were then divided into 2 groups based on the treatment type: the CR group (20 hips) and the MOR group (21 hips). All hips from both groups were assessed with post-spica magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the first 24 hours, and reinterventions were recorded. Medial dye pool width was also measured.

Results: Age at the time of reduction was similar between the CR and MOR groups (6.6 ± 1.3 months vs. 6.7 ± 1.6 months). There was no significant difference between groups regarding avascular necrosis rate and further corrective surgery (FCS) requirement (P=.454, .697). The appropriate reduction was seen at 38/41 hips. Three hips in the CR group had revealed dislocation in post-spica MRIs and required re-intervention, and none of the hips in the MOR group required re-intervention (P=.107). Medial dye pool width in 3 planes showed no significant difference between MOR and CR.

Conclusion: There is no difference in the avascular necrosis rate and FCS requirements between CR and MOR under age 1. Post-spica MRI is a favorable tool for evaluating reduction after CR, but its efficacy after MOR is questionable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Three-plane (30° anterior, neutral, and 30° posterior) measurement of medial dye pool (MDP) on mid-axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in post-spica MRI. The MDP is calculated by dividing the A, B, and C distances in the femoral head width.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Radiographic example for both closed (A, B) and medial open (C, D) reduction. Both patients underwent initial surgery at 6 months. Favorable radiologic outcomes were obtained during the 4-year follow-up.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Immediate post-spica magnetic resonance image after closed reduction revealed a subluxated left hip. Patient treated with subsequent anterior open reduction.

References

    1. Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20 33. (10.1097/00003086-198612000-00004) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas SR. A review of long-term outcomes for late presenting developmental hip dysplasia. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(6):729 733. (10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35395) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper AP, Doddabasappa SN, Mulpuri K. Evidence-based management of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(3):341 354. (10.1016/j.ocl.2014.03.005) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankar WN, Gornitzky AL, Clarke NMP, et al. Closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: early-term results from a prospective, multicenter cohort. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(3):111 118. (10.1097/BPO.0000000000000895) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitale MG, Skaggs DL. Developmental dysplasia of the hip from six months to four years of age. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(6):401 411. (10.5435/00124635-200111000-00005) - DOI - PubMed